|
| |
Issues Brief
A publication of the policy issues facing the citizens of King County.
August 1999
ISSUE BRIEF is a periodic publication of
the Municipal League foundation, an organization that studies and investigates
matters of public interest to the citizens of King County and the state,
including issues that are currently the subject of legislative action, so long
as no positions are taken regarding adoption or rejection.
Editor: Jocelyn Marchisio
Contributors: Deryl Brown-Archie,
Tom Albro, Norward Brooks, Virginia Gunby, Jocelyn Marchisio, Lois North, George
Scott, Lucy Steers
Index of Articles
The following articles are contained on this page. Click a
link to scroll down quickly.
A TURBULENT LEGISLATIVE SESSION
With a politically divided House and dual speakers, the 1999 state
legislature adjourned on April 27 after 105 days of deliberations. Though locked
in combat throughout most of the session, the lawmakers were finally able to
adopt the state's biennial budget and agree on passage of educational
initiatives.
BIENNIAL BUDGET
Novel facets of the budget include:
- The ability of public universities to raise their own tuitions up to 8.2%
and put the proceeds into faculty salaries.
- The eligibility of middle-class families for tuition subsidies.
- An initial down payment of $8 million for migrant worker housing.
- Provision for local economic development in recognition of the fact that
there are two Washingtons: Pugetopolis and the twenty counties where
unemployment runs as high as 16%.
- Raises of 6.2% for state employees.
- Raises of 3% for all public school employees, with beginning teachers and
those with more than 15 years experience receiving slightly more.
Given the lid on spending imposed by Initiative 601, there is no way these
hundreds of millions of dollars could have been found were it not for the most
phenomenal economy in Washington's 110 years. The key disagreement between the
parties was over the size of a reserve and the amount to be spent in this
biennium, which, in turn, will determine how much can be spent under 601 in the
future. Thus the struggle was even more than usual a "philosophical"
one. If the economy falters, budget cuts, increased taxes or both will be
needed. If the economy remains brisk, there may be more revenue available in
2001-2003 than can be spent under 601, and the battle then will be over whether
the lid stays. There is a move afoot to either repeal or modify 601 by
initiative; therefore, the 2000 session of the Legislature is likely to be
equally philosophical.
EDUCATION INITIATIVE
Passage of HB
1674 by the House is indicative of the public unrest over the quality of
the public schools, however the bill was never brought to a vote in the Senate.
It would have created and defined a Certificate of Mastery to be taken in the
tenth grade as a prerequisite to graduation from high school, beginning with
students graduating in the year 2008.
With testing and performance standards already in place, the special session
delivered on accountability, creating an oversight commission, setting state
standards, and providing intervention for struggling districts (SB
5418). A voucher system which would allow students to choose between the
public school system or be subsidized to the same level in the private schools
continues to get attention.
TRANSPORTATION BUDGET
Left on the table at the end of the regular session of the Legislature
here the state transportation budget and salmon legislation. A special session
devoted to these subjects plus the Governor's request for funds for school
safety, opened on May 17, 1999.
Power struggles among the House and Senate Transportation Committee chairs
and committee members continued from the regular session and focused on
dismantling the 52-year-old Legislative
Transportation Committee (LTC). It meets monthly between sessions on
transportation matters. This became a major disagreement, stalling passage of
the $4 billion state transportation budget. Eventually a compromise was reached
by appropriating the Senate's share of the $2 million LTC Budget to the Senate
Transportation Committee, chaired by Mary Margaret Haugen, 10th District
Democrat from the Island Skagit/Snohomish area. The balance will go the LTC
chaired by House Transportation Committee co-chairs Karen Schmidt, Republican,
23rd District, Kitsap County, and Ruth Fisher, Democrat, 27th District,
Tacoma/Fife.
With that controversy over, the record-breaking $4 billion state
transportation biennial budget was adopted. It included $625 million new funds
from the $2.4 billion statewide Referendum 49, approved by the voters in
November, 1998. Over 90% of this money will be spent for constructing state
highway projects. Alternatives to urban highway projects to provide more travel
choices such as regional rail or bus transit systems received no funding and
neither did pedestrian and bicycle projects. Funding was included for passenger
ferries and a second daily inter-city rail round trip between Vancouver, B.C.
and Seattle.
GETTING TO EFFECTIVE GOVERNMENTAL BUDGETS
Earlier this year, the Municipal League Foundation, the educational arm of
the Municipal League of King County, conducted a study of the budgets of five
public jurisdictions: the cities of Bellevue, Federal Way, and Seattle, the Port
of Seattle, and Sound Transit. Two versions of "Good Budgets" are
available at the League office. The summary version is available upon request by
League members, and the detailed version that contains methodology is available
at a nominal fee. Please call 206-622-8333 to request your copy.
MONITORING CHANGE IN THE PUGET SOUND REGION
The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC)
has developed an excellent tool for monitoring regional progress in maintaining
the livability of the Puget Sound Region. The PSRC is a collaborative forum
composed of elected and other public officials of King, Kitsap, Pierce and
Snohomish counties, 65 cities, three ports and two state agencies. It has
produced two analyses of change in the region, each entitled Regional Review.
The first covers the years 1996 and 1997 and the second covers 1998. Each Regional
Review is a collection of data in the areas of population, employment and
housing, which measure the region's progress toward a safe, healthy, high
quality of life for present and future generations.
The Reviews use the goals and policies adopted in the 1990 regional
VISION 2020 and the 1995 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. They build on the
analysis of previous years, monitoring change in regional growth, public
facilities/services, housing, the economy, rural character, and transportation
facilities. They are unique in scope and depth, examining whether the growth and
change in the central Puget Sound region are consistent with adopted regional
and local plans.
The Reviews demonstrate that population, employment and the economy of
the Puget Sound region grew at a higher rate in 1998 than in 1996-1997, largely
due to increased economic diversification and decreased dependency on the
aerospace industry. It appears, however, that we are not sharing the wealth: the
expansion of Puget Sound's economic development has not spread into other
regions of the state, thus thwarting one of the original objectives of the
1990-1991 state Growth Management Act (GMA). The Puget Sound region comprises
55% of the state's population and 65% of the state's jobs.
In 1990-1991, the state passed legislation to require that regional and local
growth management plans/policies be adopted to decrease sprawl and to
concentrate growth in urban centers and within the urban growth areas (UGAs). Regional
Review research has mixed findings on the success of man -- aging growth.
Within King County, 92% of the building permits in 1996-1997 have been within
the designated UGA. However, Pierce and Kitsap counties issued more building
permits outside their UGAs in 1997 than in 1996, thereby increasing sprawl and
decreasing open space and rural land, a negative trend.
It may be premature to draw conclusions from the findings of the first two Regional
Reviews, but some early warning signals are evident. The public is being
asked to participate in the process of updating countywide and local growth
management plans as they are being reviewed and revised to respond to changing
conditions. The plans and policies are to be readopted by 2002. The information
found in the Regional Review will be useful in refining local growth
management plans, regional policies and programs; in responding to inconsistent
public actions; and in sustaining the livability of our region far into the
future.
Citizens interested in participating in the updates of their Growth
Management Plans are advised to request schedules for public involvement from
their city or county governments. For copies of the 1998 Regional Review,
contact the PSRC Information Center, 206-464-7532. PSRC's website is http://www.psrc.org/infoctr.htm.
LIBRARIES FOR ALL
On November 3, 1998, the voters of Seattle overwhelmingly approved a bond
measure for $196,400,000 to pay for the cost of designing, constructing,
acquiring, improving, renovating, and equipping neighborhood and Central Library
facilities. The Libraries for All plan, upon which the bond measure was based,
was the product of more than a decade of planning, the most recent phase of
which saw Library leaders attending dozens and dozens of community and
neighborhood meetings all over the city to receive input on citizens1 dreams and
desires for their libraries.
The huge bond issue, the largest ever for a public library system in the
United States, will fund the replacement of the overcrowded and seismically
unsound Central Library with a larger facility on the site of the present
Central Library. During construction, collections and services now housed in the
Central Library will be provided in an interim site downtown, not yet
determined. After an exhaustive and highly public selection process, the Library
has announced that Rem Koolhaas, internationally acclaimed Dutch architect, will
design the new Central Library facility. In addition, all 22 of the existing
neighborhood branches will be upgraded, expanded or replaced, and new branches
will be added in Deiridge, Northgate, and the International District. Finally,
the bond issue includes a $6 million Opportunity Fund to address new or
unanticipated neighborhood library capital needs not addressed by Libraries for
All. In addition to the bond funds, the Library Foundation has pledged to raise
$40 million in private funds, and the Gates Foundation has contributed $20
million to be used for neighborhood branch improvements.
The Library Board is legally charged with the implementation of this vast,
nine-year undertaking. Assisting it in providing oversight are two bodies. The
Oversight Committee is made up of two city council members, two library
trustees, the City's Finance Director, and four citizens appointed by the Mayor;
its primary function is to monitor the expenditure of the bond proceeds. The
Citizen Implementation Review Panel is made up of 15 citizens, seven appointed
by the City Neighborhood Council, seven by the Library Board, and one by the
other 14 members; it provides financial oversight, advises on Opportunity Fund
allocations and on the use of architecture to achieve construction and
maintenance efficiencies, acts as a sounding board for community opinion, and
provides constructive criticism on all aspects of implementation.
Additional information on Libraries for All can be accessed at http://www.spl.lib.wa.us.
Transportation
Few current issues capture and arouse the public's interest and frustration
as much as the problems faced every day in moving around the Puget Sound region.
Options for solving transportation problems are being addressed at every level
of government, and are prompting debate in the private sector as well. The
Municipal League Foundation is gathering information about transportation plans
currently being considered and implemented, who's doing what, and how long it
will take.
Members of the League have an opportunity to help select the areas of special
concern that should be addressed. Do the problems involved with Sound
Transit-Light Rail, Commuter Transit and Express buses have a high priority? Are
the monorail and ferry system of great concern? How about local bus
service-Metro Transit and other systems? Is there greater concern about local
streets/ potholes and neighborhood traffic? Are there innovative funding
proposals? Should the governance of transportation systems be changed, such as
in Vancouver, Atlanta or Portland, for example?
The Municipal League Foundation would like to hear which of the many
transportation issues are of greatest interest to our members. To give us your
views, please write to 810 Third Avenue, #224, Seattle, WA 98104, or e-mail to muni@munileague.org.
CAMPAIGN REFORM
The Municipal League has had a long history of interest in campaign reform.
As a member of the Coalition for Open Government it was involved in drafting,
collecting signatures for, and, in 1972, passing Initiative 276. The resulting
Public Disclosure Law established a commission to collect and oversee the
required disclosure of campaign finances.
The Public Disclosure Commission's
mission was expanded in 1992 when Initiative 134 was passed, despite League
opposition. This initiative required the Public Disclosure Commission to
increase its investigative and enforcement roles by setting limits on campaign
contributions. Many of the added requirements have caused difficulties, and
efforts have been made in recent years to improve the law, but with little
success. It appears that any further attempts at campaign reform will have to be
made in incremental steps.
During the 1999 legislative session, the following bills were introduced
in the state senate.
SB
5071 Outlaws knowingly false statements made by one campaign about
another campaign's candidate for office (The language of SB
5071 was incorporated into Substitute
HB 1673 which PASSED both houses and was signed by the
governor. Hereafter, a person cannot lawfully sponsor with actual malice a
false statement of material fact about a candidate for public office. This
does not apply to statements made by a candidate or the candidate's agent
about the candidate himself or herself, however.)
SB
5446 reinstates the rights of local governments to implement public
campaign financing programs (DIED in committee).
SB
5640 Establishes a task force to look at rescheduling the primary
election. (PASSED by both houses). SB
5899 increases penalties for violations of campaign public disclosure
laws (DIED in committee). SB
5900 Requires greater disclosure for certain types of political
advertising, and further regulates independent expenditures (DIED in
committee).
SB
5931 Requires the Public Disclosure Commission to make technological
improvements in order to ensure fuller and more timely disclosure of campaign
reports, and seeks the money to help the agency meet those requirements (PASSED
both Houses unanimously). The Public Disclosure Commission requested that the
governor veto several sections since not enough money was provided to the
agency to meet all of the added requirements. However, the governor signed it
as passed.
SALMON RECOVERY
In other special session business, the 1999 Forests and Fish Act was
passed to improve forest practices for the purpose of protecting salmon habitat
as mandated by the federal Endangered Species Act.
The new Act includes 1) expanded buffer zones along the 60,000 miles of salmon
streams within 8 million acres of forestland, and 2) authorization of tax
credits for timber landowners or direct payments to small forest owners to stop
tree cutting near streams, and provision of regulatory predictability for
timber owners for the next 50 years.
Another part of the Act creates a Salmon Recovery Funding Board and provides $119
million to pay for habitat restoration projects. The Board will consist of five
voting members - the Governor's representative and four citizens appointed by the Governor and
confirmed by the Senate - and five non-voting members from state natural
resource and transportation agencies. The legislation also sets guidelines for
distributing some of the state salmon recovery monies to cities, counties and
non-profit groups.
The special session ended on May 19, 1999. Governor Locke intended to call an
additional one-day special session before the June 30 deadline for the purpose
of passing extended unemployment and training benefits for aerospace, forest,
and fishing industry workers, but was unable to reach the legislative agreement
necessary to call it. Authorization for state benefit programs ended on June 30,
the end of the state's fiscal year.
KING COUNTY ISSUES
King County is currently addressing two high-profile issues: salmon recovery
and sewage disposal. A program to ensure the preservation of our native salmon
population is moving ahead in conjunction with Snohomish and Pierce counties.
County Executives Bob Drewel (Snohomish), Ron Sims (King) and Doug Sutherland
(Pierce) are showing exceptional leadership in reacting to the designation of
the Chinook Salmon as an endangered species, and in refusing to sit back and let
the federal governrnent dictate solutions.
Secondly, King County-Metro has recognized that the county must start now on
the planning and construction of a third major sewage disposal plant. The West
Point plant and the Renton plant will soon reach capacity. The siting of the new
plant, possibly in north King County, is currently under discussion and review
An additional issue, congestion management, or what we citizens call
"traffic gridlock," is the top concern of the county's Transportation
Department. And since major growth continues to take place in the unincorporated
areas of King County, affordable housing (including rental units) continues to
be a major issue for county government.
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
The City of Seattle faces the constant challenge of how to support worthwhile
projects in an atmosphere of ever tightening budgets. As resources from federal
and state governments continue to decline, local communities increasingly seek
innovative ways to accomplish projects for the public good. Carefully structured
public-private partnerships represent one way that community objectives can be
achieved.
In November 1998, Seattle Mayor Paul Schell and City Council President Sue
Donaldson appointed a citizen task force to develop a set of standards for
future public-private partnerships between the City of Seattle and private
entities. The 18-member task force has since researched protocols of standards
used by other municipalities, and gathered information from City staff~ private
sector representatives, and public interest panelists. The mission of the task
force is to ensure that future partnerships are structured to clearly meet
public objectives.
A key challenge is assuring an open process in which the public is informed
and has opportunity to raise questions, while keeping worthy projects on track,
on time and beneficial to all parties. The group is currently modifying a
typology of standards drafted by project facilitator David Harrison, Director of
Northwest Forum; it is expected that task force recommendations will be ready by
late summer for presentation to the Mayor and Council.
Further information on the work of the task force can be accessed at http://www.ci.seattle.wa.us/oed/ppptf/overview.htm.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND OUT ABOUT TRANSPORTATION
COUNTY LEVEL
Chair of the King County Metro Transportation Committee is Councilmember Rob
McKenna of east King County/Bellevue, District #6. The committee reviews and
recommends King County transportation policies, budgets and regulatory actions
to the full Council. Website: http://www.metrokc.gov/mkcc/.
The King County Metro Transit Regional Committee is chaired by Councilmember
Maggi Fimia of north King County/Shoreline, District #l. This committee sets
transit operations policy, reviews transit budgets and service revisions for the
operation of the bus transit system within King County.
STATE LEVEL
The Washington State Transportation Commission is a 7-member
policy-making body that serves as the Board of Directors of the Department of
Transportation, providing oversight to ensure that the Department delivers
quality transportation facilities and services in a cost-effective manner.
Representing the Puget Sound area are Aubrey Davis of Mercer Island, George
Kargianis of Bellevue, and Connie Niva of Everett. Phone: 360-705 7070. Website:
http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/commission.
State legislative policy is developed and passed by the Senate
Transportation Committee chaired by Senator Mary Margaret Haugen, haugen_ma@leg.wa.gov,
and the House Transportation Committee, co-chaired by Representative Ruth
Fisher, fisher_ru@leg.wa.gov, and
Representative Karen Schmidt, schmidt_ka@leg.wa.gov.
The Blue Ribbon Commission on Transportation consists of 42 appointed members
from the public and private sectors and is chaired by Doug Beighle. Website:
http://www.brct.wa.gov.
REGIONAL LEVEL
The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) is a four-county federal and state
designated Regional Planning Organization (RTPO). It has the responsibility of
preparing and adopting a Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) based on a
four-county VISION 2020 Plan. The last MTP was adopted in 1995 and the
transportation staff are beginning the process to update the plan by 2001. King
Cushman is the Director of the transportation planning program. Phone:
206-464-6174. Website: http://www.psrc.org.
Established by a vote of the three-county (King, Pierce and Snohomish) region
in November 1996, Sound Transit (legal name: Central Puget Sound Regional
Transit Authority, or RTA) is managed by an 18-member policy board of primarily
local city and county officials. The Sound Transit Chair is Tacoma City
Councilmember Paul Miller, its Executive Director, Bob White. Phone: 206-
398-5000. Website: http://www.soundtransit.org.
The Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Authority (PSAPCA) is mandated by
federal law to monitor the air in the four-county region to ensure that we are
meeting federal and state clean air standards. It has an advisory board
consisting of local elected officials from within the four counties. Dennis
McLerran is Executive Director.
CITY LEVEL
The Seattle City Council Transportation Committee is chaired by Councilmember
Richard Mclver. This committee sets policy, recommends the proposed annual
budget and provides legislative oversight of the administrative department
SEATRANS. Bellevue City Council has a 7-member citizens' Transportation
Commission staffed by Jane Gray, 425-452-6459. City Councilmembers Connie
Marshall and Conrad Lee are the Council liaisons to the Commission on a number
of transportation issues. Website: http://www.ci.bellevue.wa.us.
The following website features links to all of the counties, cities, regional
planning agencies and transit providers in the Puget Sound region: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/regions/northwest/links.htm.
|