1910-1985: 75 Years of Citizenship
The Municipal League of King County - A History by Walt Crowley
This article was published by the League in1985.
Foreword
The history set forth in these pages is in briefest
essence the history of the accomplishments of committed volunteers in bringing
about improved governmental structures and practices in Seattle and King County
Over the past 75 years, the Municipal League of Seattle and King County-and
more recently its affiliated East-side Municipal League-have functioned as
nonpartisan education and research organizations, They have assisted the
community in identifying and defining its problems and its opportunities in
challenging the opportunity with new ideas; in developing recommendations for
change in policy and in action, and in guiding the citizenry generally in the
selection of effective public servants.
From its 1910 advocacy of creation, of a Port Commission to its 1985 study
and recommendations dealing with the mental health problems of the homeless in
our midst, the League has maintained its determination and its capacity for
serving the community. Even members unable to commit time to League studies and
recommendations are beneficiaries of our public education efforts. Notably,
these include public forum programs which pinpoint problems and the policy
options associated with them, and the evaluation of candidates and ballot
issues.
And that may be just the place to stop this foreword, for in the current
reform and strengthening of the candidate evaluation process and other League
programs, we give promise of community service extending into year
seventy-six and beyond.
Phil Swain, President
Creating the Civic Ideal
At the turn of the century, American capitalism was bursting at the seams
with new markets, technologies, products, and frontiers, and the national scene
was being rapidly and permanently transformed from a rural into an industrial
landscape.
Nowhere were these changes more dramatically visible than in the cities of
the East Coast, with their waves of immigrants, teeming tenements, and soaring
skyscrapers and smokestacks. In the West, too, the arrival of the railroads and
the opening of the great markets of the Orient turned frontier
settlements into metropolises virtually overnight.
With these economic changes came social dislocations. The gap between the
owners of industry and property and the men, women, and children who toiled in
the factories and fields widened. Between them rose a new middle class of
mechanics, managers, professionals, technicians. and merchants. As clashes
increased between the prosperous and the poor, this new class began to find its
own voice.
The fledgling middle class espoused a broad and energetic reform movement.
bracketed by the twin virtues of Victorian morality and technocratic efficiency.
Some turned to the Socialists for guidance, other joined the largely rural
Populists, but most middle class reformers assembled under the banner of
"Progress."
These urban progressives championed a host of causes, not all of them
necessarily complementary: prohibition. public education, improved sanitation,
women's suffrage, breaking up the industrial trusts, construction of public
parks, comprehensive planning, slum clearance, child labor laws and improved
working conditions in the factories. Their heroes included Lincoln Steffens and
Uptown Sinclair, but it was Theodore Roosevelt's progressivism which best
embraced the middle class' dreams for a decent society created out of and guided
by the enlightened self-interest of its members.
In what Steffens called "the shame of the cities," the reformers
found their greatest challenge. The movement added organizational muscle with
the founding in 1894 of the National 'Municipal League, led by Teddy Roosevelt,
and the proliferation of "Municipal Research Bureaus" in major cities,
including Seattle's first, short-lived Municipal League. The weapons wielded by
these reformers included civil service to break the back of patronage-peddlers,
ambitious plans for civic parks and redevelopment such as those designed by the
Olmsted brothers, and citizens' leagues to close the Red Light Districts and
build settlement houses in their place. They fought the ward-based systems of
government graft, such as New York's "Tweed Ring," and by 1900 ,the
reformers were scoring impressive victories in the courts and at the ballot box.
In retrospect, many of this early movement's dreams must appear quaint or
naive, but the truth is that much of the structure and philosophy of modern
government owes its existence to the successes of these municipal reformers.
More broadly, they helped to redefine the American Dream, replacing the
traditional, rural ideal with a modern civic ideal. In this way, the rise of the
middle class, it can be argued, helped to save" America by prodding it to
define a more realistic future. It certainly helped to blunt the class
antagonisms that gripped the rest of the industrialized world at the start of
the Twentieth Century, and thereby led to the creation of a more humane and
uniquely American brand of industrial society.
It accomplished this by interposing a new, vital, self-defined
"center" in society, and it reinvigorated the ideal of selfless,
creative and nonpartisan citizenship. Often invoking the example of Cincinnatus,
the citizen-farmer who laid down his plow to defend Rome in the Fifth Century
B.C., this movement pioneered the middle path of progress between the antipodes
of reaction and revolution.
As such, it is the antecedent of contemporary drives for public disclosure of
campaign contributions, for community planning, for responsible public
budgeting, for citizen participation in decisions, and for open and accountable
government at all levels, which are chronicled in the following chapters.
The history of the Municipal League of Seattle and King County embraces and
exemplifies the remarkable saga of the American middle class as it built a
creative new center for urban society by promoting the civic ideals of
efficiency, and decency.
The Shame of the Cities
No doubt inspired by Teddy Roosevelt's example with the creation of the
National Municipal League in Philadelphia, 49 of the leading citizens of Seattle
met in the offices of the Commercial Club to create their own "Municipal
League" on March 17, 1894. Seattle had only been settled 43 years earlier
and it had been incorporated as a city for barely a quarter of a century, so it
is not surprising that this gathering included many of the city's founders,
including Arthur Denny, Morgan Carkeek. Dexter Horton, and John McGilvra. As
written in the group's constitution, their aims were "to separate the
administration of municipal affairs from party politics" and otherwise
"to vigilantly watch over, criticize, approve or condemn" the city
government.
From this initial Saturday evening session came a successful campaign to
rewrite Seattle's City Charter in 1896, but by the time of the election, the
nascent League had already ceased meeting.
Fourteen years elapsed before serious efforts began in the fall of 1909 with
the aim of reviving the Municipal
League. This time it was a different kind of group which met to ponder the
state of Seattle-lawyers, physicians, managers, and other professional men, many
of whom had been drawn to the burgeoning metropolis only recently. They met in
the law offices of Herr, Bayley, Wilson & Smith for months before
consolidating a cadre of leaders bold enough to frame a constitution for a
resuscitated Municipal League.
They finally unveiled their proposals at a public meeting on May 23, 1910.
and to the surprise and pleasure of the organizers, 120 men promptly signed on
as charter members, electing Hugh N. Caldwell (later mayor of Seattle) as the
president of the new Municipal League of Seattle. They dedicated themselves to
the ideals of active citizenship, competent officials, wholesome legislation,
scientific investigation, full publicity, and constructive solutions."
In the Seattle of 1910, they had their job cut out for them. Thanks largely
to the Klondike gold rush of 1897, the city had exploded with new wealth and
population. Within its then 59 square miles of land (since more than doubled
through successive annexations) lived 237,194 men, women and children served by
a little over 1,000 acres of parks, 67 public schools, and one University
boasting 2,000 students. People and goods traveled along 140 miles of paved
streets and 101 miles of planked streets, with the other 522 miles alternating
between dust and mud, mostly the latter. Eight transcontinental railroads and 57
steamship lines carried 546 million in annual exports and almost 550 million in
imports, and over 13,000 building permits were granted in 1910 alone.
With such growth and prosperity came graft, patronage, crime, prostitution,
racial tension, poverty, and all the ills of modern city life. For the Municipal
League and other reformers such as the Public Welfare League, these evils were
personified by the incumbent mayor Hiram Gill who supported an "open
town" policy of tolerance toward the city's thriving Red Light district,
gambling, and other vices. In October of 1910, the League and its allies
petitioned for Hill's recall and the voters ousted him at the next election
(Hill would return to office three years later as a 'reform candidate.")
"Throwing the rascals out" was not the sum of the League's agenda,
however. It also campaigned for a variety of positive programs, including a
municipal telephone service and creation of a Municipal Plans Commission. The
latter retained the services of Frederick Law Olmsted's protégé. Virgil Rogue,
who drafted a visionary
comprehensive plan calling for, among other improvements, creation of a San
Francisco-style Civic Center in the then incomplete Denny Regrade, a trolley
tunnel under Lake Washington and acquisition of Mercer Island as a city park.
The plan elicited determined opposition from the city establishment, excoriated
by the League as the "Downtown Trust," which feared Bogue's Civic
Center would devalue the central business district. Despite a valiant campaign
led by such notables as city engineer R.H. Thompson, the Bogue Plan was crushed
at the polls in 1912, landing the fledgling League its first defeat.
Undaunted, the Municipal League continued to press for reforms. In 1912 it
conducted its first evaluation of candidates, and in 1913, it made the first use
of the new power of referendum to repeal an ordinance it perceived as
"tying the hands of the police." It pressed for creation of a Port
Commission, for pasteurization of milk, for civil service examinations for city
and county workers, for competitive bidding for public works contracts, for
nonpartisan elections, for annual budgeting, and a host of other reforms we now
take for granted.
During these early years, the Municipal League also sided more often than not
with organized labor and social reformers in calling for the 8-hour day, child
labor laws, health and safety regulation of working conditions, and relief for
the unemployed. It campaigned for slum clearance, editorializing "Greed
held cause for building congestion," and for emergency housing in 1915 for
an estimated 5,000 "home-less men." In these and subsequent campaigns.
the League joined forces with other organizations-its victories were invariably
shared by kindred groups.
Railing against election frauds and political graft, the League agitated in
1913 against construction of the City-County Building (now the King County Court
House) as a "humbug" and for consolidation of county and municipal
government. Despite such grand crusades, the League also found time to advocate
music in the parks to "exert an uplifting moral influence which will help
[the people] bear their burdens with less grumbling," and to propose a
system of public "comfort stations" to replace the restrooms in some
300 bars expected to be closed in 1916 by the advent of Prohibition.
By the close of the First World War, however, the League had taken a more
conservative turn, aided undoubtedly by the chaos of the Seattle General Strike
of 1919 and the Red Scare that swept the nation. Many of the League's members
were now themselves part of the "Establishment,” and they focused their
attention and energies on a narrower scope of political and govern mental
reforms.
Old Problems, New Tools
In the Twenties, the League campaigned doggedly to institute a city manager
form of municipal government, reluctantly abandoning the cause in 1926 after
losing the second vote on the issue by a mere Ill ballots out of 90,000. Its
efforts to promote land-use planning and zoning met with more success
when the City Planning Commission was established in 1924. During this decade,
the League's interests touched on themes that would recur later in its history,
including a proposal for a privately financed pontoon bridge across Lake
Washington, creation of a tri-county Sewage Commission to combat the increasing
pollution of Lake Washington and Puget Sound, and advocacy of a special property
tax to subsidize the city's trolley system.
Despite the hiring of an energetic and ambitious young attorney named Warren
G. Magnuson as its secretary in 1930, the fortunes of the Municipal
League, like the rest of the of the country, plummeted as the Great Depression
took hold. Membership declined from over a thousand to bare 300, compelling the
League to take two major steps: it hired its first full-time executive
secretary, Glen Eastburn, and it finally voted to admit women as members. The
latter proposal had been "on the table' since 1913, but League elders
repeatedly dodged the issue through many of the same sort of parliamentary
maneuvers they deplored in government. On March 6, 1937, a full 17 years after
ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment to the US Constitution, the board of
the Municipal League voted 18 to 7 to install its first female members.
Despite its depleted numbers and the distractions of Depression at home and
war clouds abroad, the League kept busy during the Thirties. It advocated the
permanent registration of voters to replace the extant system under which
citizens registered anew for each election, and it continued its campaign for
city-county government consolidation, improved public budgeting, and long range
capital planning. In 1934, the League even dallied with promotion of a political
slate, endorsing "The Order of Cincinnatus" candidates who swept out
the incumbent Seattle City Council in that year's elections.
By 1940, League membership had begun to rebound, reaching 682, under the
guidance of then secretary Murray Morgan, now a respected historian. Morgan was
succeeded by Ewen Dingwall, who would later make his own mark as director of the
1962 Century 21 World's Fair. Despite the demands of World War II, the League
remained active, successfully arguing in 1943 for a Freeholders election to
draft.
a new City Charter for Seattle and in 1945 for new state law mandating
centralized county purchasing. Following the end of the war, the League won
passage of the new City Charter in 1946, which remains the city's basic organic
law, and the adoption in 1948 of state law permitting "home rule"
county charters.
The Fifties brought new growth and influence for the Municipal League. Its
rolls swelled to 5,206 members in 1952 (before a dues increase trimmed them back
to almost 4,000 by the end of the decade) and the League undertook what would
become its greatest achievement, the creation of the Municipality of
Metropolitan Seattle, or as it is better known, "Metro."
The seed was planted in a speech by a young attorney named James R. Ellis,
who called in 1953 for a "metropolitan government" for greater
Seattle. The proposal was formally embraced by the League in its 1955 report
"Metropolitan Seattle - The Shape We're In” authored in large part by
Ellis. At the time scientists were predicting that Lake Washington had only a
few years "to live" before it choked on algae fed by the raw sewage
pumped into it by neighboring cities. With its report and these warnings, the
League won passage in 1957 of a state law to permit creation of a county-wide
"municipality" for water quality, waste management, transit, and parks
super-vision. The issue was taken to the voters in March 1958 but failed to
pass. A revised proposal was put on the fall ballot, and met with voter
approval, launching the initial 5135 million program "to clean up Lake
Washington."
If Metro was the League's biggest undertaking during the Fifties, it was
hardly its only. The League campaigned hard but unsuccessfully for a new County
Charter in 1952, championed creation of the City Transit Commission, led the
fight to expand the Pert Commission from three to five elected members, secured
the election of municipal and traffic judges, prodded the Seattle School
District into reforming its civics and social studies curriculum, arranged for
the first evaluation of municipal finances and operations by an independent
private accounting firm, drafted Seattle's first noise control ordinance, and
promoted the installation of sprinklers in the city's older, wood-framed
schools.
The League maintained this extraordinary level of activity into the Sixties.
Again, it was James Ellis who laid down the League's most important challenge
when, in 1966, he delivered a speech entitled "The City-A Cause Waiting for
Rebellion." He challenged the community to take control of its own
accelerating growth through a comprehensive program of capital improvements,
including rapid transit and new parks, roads, and civic facilities. The proposal
was soon augmented with additional ideas, such as that for a "county domed stadium," and became known as "Forward
Thrust." $334 million of Forward Thrust bonds were passed by the voters in
1968 for virtually all of its projects, with the notable exception of rapid rail
transit.
The year 1961 also brought success for one of the League's longest fought
battles, the campaign to create a new charter for King County. The decade ended
in a flurry of activity in behalf of a County Ombudsman's Office, a County
hearing examiner system, a household tax to help subsidize Seattle Transit
(remember 1921?), and as a token of the "good old days," a grand jury
investigation into vice, graft, and payoffs in the Seattle Police Department.
Transportation problems headed the Municipal League's agenda for most of the
Seventies, beginning with its research into proposals for the 1-90 bridge and
the proposed Bay Freeway between I-5 and Seattle Center. The League scored a
major victory in 1972 when the voters delegated management of a county-wide
transit system to Metro.
Perhaps its best remembered accomplishment of the decade, however, was the
revelation of massive irregularities in the design and budgeting of the proposed
high-level West Seattle Bridge. The League's findings spurred a grand jury
investigation that culminated in the conviction of the city engineer and two
powerful State Legislators for corruption.
On other fronts, the League joined with many civic organizations to promote
Initiative 276, which created the Public Disclosure Commission, open meeting
laws, and the reporting of campaign contributions when it passed in 1972. Also
in 1972, the League challenged a city proposal for 540 million in bonds to
repair bridges, and when voters rejected the bonds, it helped the city to find
58 million in unspent funds to do the job with. It also investigated
irregularities in Seattle’s attempts to acquire a computerized financial
system, which led to sweeping reforms in city purchasing proposals.
In 1973, the League advocated election of Freeholders to draft a new City
Charter, but the panel split over whether to create City Council districts (an
issue which divided the League n 1911), and the proposed Charter failed. The
League rebounded in 1977, helping to win passage of four out of five proposed
amendments to update the 1946 Charter it had originally helped to write. As the
decade closed, the League lent its support to the Seattle School District's
desegregation plan and it promoted revision of Seattle's Comprehensive Plan, a
process that it is still continuing almost ten years later.
Finding the Center Again
Entering the Eighties, the Municipal League remained active but at a much lower pitch. By this decade, it was becoming a victim of its own,
numerous successes.
The League had triumphed in fundamentally restructuring both city and county
government and it had promoted creation of a successful Port and an innovative
county-wide Metro with broad powers in water quality, waste management, and
transit.
The League had secured adoption and major revision at a Comprehensive Plan
for Seattle. It had promoted countless improvements in public procedures,
practices, services, and facilities.
The League had helped to root out patronage hiring and graft at all levels of
government, and through its candidate evaluations, had helped to promote the
election of honest and able public servants. The League had made the idea of
citizen participation respectable and it helped to secure the reforms to make it
effective.
It is not surprising, therefore, that the League began as early as its 60th anniversary to question whether there
was anything left for it to do. Given the myriad of single issue and special
interest groups, it asked itself, is there a role for a centrist, progressive,
consensus-based organization such as the Municipal League?
The question really answers itself. In such a context, there is more reason
for such an organization than there has ever been before. The alternative is a
community politics defined and dominated by its extremes. It is to give voice to
the center that the Municipal League was created, has always worked, and remains
an indispensable institution.
The challenges of growth, social need, incipient corruption, government
waste, and the abuses of power are not artifacts of the past. The problems of
mass transit, or urban sprawl, or environmental degradation, of poverty have not
been solved; indeed, they have no permanent solutions.
Seattle and King County have experienced a remarkable 75 years since the
Municipal League was established. The nature of the next 75 years will depend in
large part on the region's ability to achieve and maintain agreement on a common
set of values and goals for self-government, economic development, and social
improvement. Such agreement can only come from the center. and that is why, if
the Municipal League did not already exist, we would have to create it.
Postscript: The Next 75 Years
The preceding history is not merely a chronicle of the achievements of the
Municipal League. This history is really the story of the contributions of
scores of community organizations-the League of Women Voters, chambers of
commerce community councils, environmental groups, churches, social action
organizations, political parties, and more-and tens of thousands of volunteers
from every class and walk of life who have given their time and money to make
Seattle and King County a better community.
For the future of the Municipal League as an organization, probably the most
important (and most positive) change since 1910 has been the rise of citizen
participation in all levels of government. Where the Municipal League once
shared the public podium with a handful of citizen groups, now hundreds compete
for the attention of government and the electorate. Thus the Municipal League
faces a most welcome challenge-the challenge of its own success in encouraging
and sustaining creative and effective citizen participation in government.
The Municipal League recognizes that any mature organization. whatever its
accomplishments. is either building upon its successes (and learning from its
disappointments) or it is living off them, slowly depleting its reserves of
reputation and draining its members energies. Equally, the Municipal League
knows that it can-and should-only continue to exist by virtue of its new
contributions to the public's well-being, not by dint of past glories. For these
reasons, the Board of Trustees of the Municipal League has undertaken four major
initiatives to reform the organization's procedures, to reinvigorate its
membership, and to assure the continuing relevance and quality of its
contributions to the community:
The Municipal League is reaffirming its commitment to strengthening the
opportunities and processes for citizen participation, both within itself by
improving its committee structures, and within the larger community by
sponsoring evening seminars on public issues to promote both member and public
education;
The Municipal League is modifying its procedures for the evaluation of
candidates to assure objective and nonpartisan analysis of candidate abilities
by initiating outside experts to participate in reviewing incumbents' past
performance, and by expanding the checking of candidate references and
backgrounds to balance subjective impressions created during candidate
interviews;
The Municipal League is embarking on an annual “Public Agenda"
process to aid both itself and the community. In understanding and forecasting
emerging public issues. This undertaking will entail publishing a quarterly
newsletter to track important issues and actors in the community; and
The Municipal League is developing new relationships with area graduate
schools, broadening its financial base, and introducing modern management
tools (such as full computerization achieved this year) to improve and
streamline its own internal operations-something it's always been quick to
chide government about doing but which it has been slow to undertake itself.
Through these initiatives and reforms, the Municipal League seeks to maintain
the opportunity for citizens-who have no other "special interest" than
to promote good government and a healthy community-to make their voices heard in
the councils of government, and to continue to provide, as the Municipal League
has for the past 75 years, a forum and a civic workshop for "the center" to make its own special contribution to Seattle and King
County.
Chronology
1894
Theodore Roosevelt helps found the National Municipal League in Philadelphia.
On March 17, A.A. Denny, Morgan J. Carkeek, John McGilvra, and 45 other leading
Seattle citizens convene in the Chamber of Commerce offices to form a Municipal
League and launch a campaign that will culminate in a new City Charter in 1896.
Despite its ultimate election victory, this prototype League does not survive
past its March 7, 1895 meeting.
1910
The Municipal League of Seattle is formally established at a May 23 meeting
of 120 charter members, all men and mostly professionals, climaxing an
organizing effort that began in the fall of 1909. Hugh M. Caldwell who would
later become City Attorney and Mayor, is elected to be the League's first
president. On October 8, the League and allied citizen organizations file
petitions for the recall of Mayor Hiram Gill and the league campaigns
successfully for creation of a "Municipal Plans Commission."
1911
Gill is recalled and voters approve Plans Commission. which hires Olmstead
protégé Virgil Bogue. The League publishes the first edition of Municipal
League News on June 24, in which it advocates a Port Commission and
nonpartisan elections.
1912
League conducts its first "evaluations" of candidates for local
office. Voters reject Virgil Bogue's visionary city plan.
1913
League membership tops 1,000. It launches Seattle's first referendum
campaign, a successful effort to repeal a City ordinance relating to police
powers. The League supports a new Charter reestablishing the ward system
(repealed in 1910), but the proposal is voted down, as is the League's own first
serious proposal to admit women as members. The League opposes plans for
City-County Building (now King County Courthouse) and proposes merger of city
and county governments.
1915
The League becomes involved in social issues, including child labor laws,
establishment of the 8-hour day, prevention of slums, and housing for transients
and unemployed workers. It also supports mandating the pasteurization of milk and opposes use of then new voting machines. Anticipating one
consequence of Prohibition, the League proposes creation of “public comfort
stations” to replace restrooms in the 300 bars to be closed the following year.
1922
The League launches the first of several unsuccessful campaigns to adopt a
City Manager form of municipal government.
1924
Seattle creates a permanent City Planning Commission at the urging of the
League.
1926
The League provides a forum for the first proposal to build a floating bridge
across Lake Washington (not achieved until 1940).
1927
The League raises the first serious alarms over water pollution and campaigns
successfully for creation of a city Sewage Commission.
1928
The League makes the first proposals for tax subsidies for public transit,
which is funded exclusively through fare revenues at the time.
1930
Warren G. Magnuson, who will later become a U.S. Senator, is hired to edit
the Seattle Municipal News, and is later promoted to executive secretary
of the League. Other luminaries who will fill these slots over the following
years include C.A. Crosser, historian Murray Morgan Seattle Center Director Ewen
Dingwall, and William Massey.
1937
The Depression takes its toll on the League as membership plummets (reaching
a nadir of 345 in 1939). The League responds by hiring its first full-time
executive secretary, Glen Eastburn, and by finally voting to admit women members
on March 6-fully 17 years after the 19th Amendment to the US Constitution
granted women the right to vote.
1943
Despite the distractions of World War II, the League remains active,
proposing a City Freeholders election that ultimately results in adoption of
Seattle’s 1946 Charter.
1948
Following on the success of its campaign for state law to mandate centralized
County purchasing in 1945, the League wins passage of enabling legislation to
permit adoption of "Home Rule" County charters. The League again
advocates the merger of city and county governments.
1950
An appointed City Transit Commission is created at the urging of the League.
The League's membership nears 4,000.
1952
A proposed King County Charter advocated by the League fails at the polls. Membership reaches 5,205.
1953
The League successfully champions expansion of the Port Commission from three
to five elected members. Attorney James R. Ellis gives a speech proposing a “Metropolitan
Government” for Greater Seattle.
1955
The League wins passage of laws providing for election of municipal judges.
The League releases a report entitled “Metropolitan Seattle-The Shape Were
In," which proposes creation of a metropolitan government for King County
and is authored in large part by James Ellis.
1958
After securing passage of enabling state legislation the year before, the
League leads the battle to win voter approval of the "Municipality of
Metropolitan Seattle," or "Metro” for short, on the fail ballot,
(having failed in the spring) and a $135 million effort is launched to clean up
Lake Washington. The League also champions the City's adoption of its first
noise control ordinance.
1959
The League helps to persuade the Seattle School District to install
sprinklers in older, wood-framed schools.
1966
In a speech to the League on January 21. James Ellis proposes a massive. comprehensive program of capital
improvements for parks, mass transit. roads, and other public facilities. This
program will later become “Forward Thrust”
1968
King County votes pass the bulk of Forward Thrust bonds, with the notable
exception of a proposed rail transit system, and they approve, at long last, a
Home Rule Charter.
1969
Buoyed by its victories on the County Charter and Forward Thrust, the League
enters a new phase of hyperactivity, proposing a County Ombudsman, a County
hearing examiner system, a household tax to support Seattle Transit services,
and a grand jury investigation into gambling and police graft in Seattle, League
membership peaks at about 5,000.
1971
The first King County Executive and County Councilmembers are elected under
the new Charter. The League becomes involved in community fights over 1-90, the
Bay Freeway, and the high-level West Seattle Bridge.
1972
The League is a leader in the campaign for Initiative 276 which establishes
open government meetings, the reporting of political contributions, and the
state Public Disclosure Commission. Locally, it successfully opposes a
$40 million bridge repair bond issue as unnecessary, and it is a leader in the
creation of Metro Transit.
1975
The League "blows the whistle" on contracting irregularities for
Seattle's financial computer system and for the West Seattle Bridge. The latter
investigation will lead to indictments against the City Engineer and two
prominent state legislators, The League also undertakes a major internal
reorganization and hosts its first 'Election Night Countdown" party.
1977
The League champions five major City Charter amendments (all but one pass),
supports the Seattle School District's desegregation plan, and becomes involved
in the revision of the Seattle Comprehensive Plan.
1979
The League is a leader in successfully opposing a plan for King County
government to absorb Metro. It begins evaluating judicial candidates for the
King County Superior Court and launches a major effort to create a partnership
between private interests and the public schools.
1980
Overcrowding in the King County Jail prompts the Municipal League to propose
solutions, and the League critiques the Mayor's proposals for reorganizing city
departments.
1981
The League proposes principles to guide the revision of Seattle's downtown
plan, and it continues major efforts to educate the public about public school
issues.
1982
The Eastside Municipal League marks its first anniversary, having evaluated
local candidates and sponsored forums on ballot issues and the disposition of
surplus school property.
1983
The League turns its attentions to planning for power rates and energy
resource recovery, and it endorses Metro’s downtown transit proposal. 0n the
Eastside, the League supports acquisition of a downtown Bellevue site for a
major new park.
1984
The League argues successfully for creation of City reserves to finance
maintenance, establishes a task force to advise in the development of King
County's Comprehensive Plan, and completes a six month study into the needs of
Seattle's homeless mentally ill population, Thus, the Municipal League begins
its anniversary year dealing with many of the same issues that motivated its
creation 75 years ago: the prudence of government administration, the need for strong public planning, and the responsiveness of the community to pressing
social needs. How much has changed since 1910, and how much remains the same!
Past Presidents
1910 Hugh Caldwell
1911 C. J. France
1912 O. B. Thorgrimson
1913 James J. Haight
1914 L. D. Lewis
1915 George E. Wright
1916 Fred W. Catlett
1917 Austin E. Griffiths
1918 Laurence S. Booth
Arthur H. Hutchinson
1919 J.W. Reynolds
1920 James T. Lawler
1921 Claude H. Anderson
1922 Julius Baldwin
1923 James J. Haight
1924 Edward W. Allen
1925 Harold Preston
1926 Nelson P. Anderson
1927 Norton C. Force
1928 Frank P. Helsell
1929 Frank J. Laube
1930 Sterling B. Hill
1931 E. L. Skeel
1932 Charles F. Riddell
1933 J. W. Clise
1934 Henry Elliott. Jr.
1935 Peter Balkema
1936 Arthur M. Hare
1937 Elvin P. Carney
1938 George LaFray
1939 George LaFray
1940 Wm D. Shannon
1941 Wm. D. Shannon
1942 Harry J. Markey
1943 Harry J. Markey
1944 Harry J. Markey
1945 Lawrence Bates
1946 Lawrence Bates
1947 Donald H. Yates
1948 John N. Rupp
1949 John N. Rupp
1950 Paul Green
1951 Ben B. Ehrlichman
1952 Ben B. Ehrlichman
1953 Myron C. Law
1954 Myron C. Law
1955 Pendleton Miller
1956 Harold S. Shefelman
1957 Harold S. Shefelman
1958 Paul P. Ashley
1959 Paul P Ashley
1960 E. L. Blame Jr
1961 E. L. Blaine Jr
1962 James R. Ellis
1963 James R. Ellis
1964 Fredric M. Kettenring
1965 Fredric M. Kettenring
1966 George Bartell Jr.
1967 George Bartell Jr.
1968 James Gay
1969 James Gay
1970 Don G. Abel Jr.
1971 Don G. Abel Jr.
1972 Ben J. Gantt Jr.
1973 Ben J. Gantt Jr.
1974 John F. Henry
1975 John F. Henry
1976 J. Shan Mullin
1977 J. Shan Mullin
1978 Jonathan Whetzel
1979 Jonathan Whetzel
1980 George M. Mack
1981 George M. Mack
1982 Lester (Larry) Kleinberg
1983 Lester (Larry) Kleinberg
1984 Phillip B. Swain
Acknowledgements
Mr. Crowley’s services courtesy of the Weekly, Seattle’s Newsmagazine,
and City of Seattle Municipal Probation Service (Parking Violations Division)
Prepared for the web by Donna Gordon and David Bangs
|