­­

  

 

 

The Municipal League of King County

810 Third Avenue, Suite 224

Seattle, WA 98104

(206) 264-1070 cec@munileague.org

2007 Board of Trustees

Bruce Carter, Chair
Judge Pro Tem, Seattle Municipal Court

Robert Klein, Vice-Chair
Short Cressman & Burgess PLLC

Norma Jean Hanson, Secretary
Norma Jean Hanson Paralegal Services

Sandra Driscoll, Treasurer
City Attorney (ret.)

 

Angela Avery, Community Volunteer

Dan Berger, Municipal Attorney

Jill D. Bowman, Stoel Rives LLP

Bill Breitenstein, Financial Executive (ret.)

David Brentlinger, Weyerhaeuser Realty Investors

Steve Call, Cascade Water Alliance

Mary Gates, Consultant

Albert Israel, Mass Mutual Financial Group

Rachel Jackson, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Chris Johnson, Office of the Attorney General, WA State

Mark Koenig, Consultant

Rick Lewis, Intel

Steve Marshall

Eric B. Martin, Davis Wright Tremaine

Bradley Meacham, Microsoft

Dan McDonald, MWH Americas

Kristen Peterson, Washington State Hospital Association

Kathy Putt, Comcast

Ramsey Ramerman, Foster Pepper

R. Todd Slind, CH2MHill

Will Smith, T-Mobile

John Spady, Dick’s Drive-In

Lucy Steers

Gary Strannigan, Safeco

Harold Taniguchi, King County Department of Transportation

Michael Teter, Perkins Coie, LLP

Wes Uhlman, Wes Uhlman & Associates

Jason Van Nort, Puget Sound Energy

Jen Watkins

Rodney G. Wendt, Koegen Edwards LLP

Rich White, Boeing

Nick Williamson, Encrypted Key Technologies

 

2007 CANDIDATE QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR NON-JUDICIAL CANDIDATES

The Municipal League of King County requests every candidate who participates in the candidate evaluation process to submit background information prior to his/her interview with a candidate evaluation committee.  The questionnaire is the basis of the League’s research and interview process.  The League’s ratings are non-partisan; they are based on standards of Involvement, Effectiveness, Character, and Knowledge, all of which have been developed and refined over the past 90 years.

 

A printed version of the questionnaire is available for candidates who prefer to use the traditional format.  To obtain a hard copy, please contact the League office.  A copy of this questionnaire will be provided to Candidate Evaluation Committee members to help them prepare for your interview.  Candidate responses, except the confidential section, will be available to the general public at the League website. 

 

The Municipal League requests the following materials from candidates.  Please check to make certain you have sent in your:

 

   Candidate Questionnaire

           Sent by:       Email             US Mail           Fax            Not Sending

   Resume (education, employment, and professional activities)

           Sent by:       Email             US Mail           Fax            Not Sending

             Check here if you DO NOT want your resume posted on the Municipal

                League website

   Campaign Materials

           Sent by:       Email             US Mail           Fax            Not Sending

   Constituent Newsletters and other publications

           Sent by:       Email             US Mail           Fax            Not Sending

   Photograph

           Sent by:       Email             US Mail           Fax            Not Sending

 

Note: Electronically submitted questionnaires are strongly preferred. All materials can be emailed to cec@munileague.org.  They can be processed and made available on-line far more rapidly than handwritten or typed submissions.

 

For non-electronic submissions, please print clearly and legibly and return the application as soon as possible in order to allow the committee the greatest amount of time to prepare a complete report on your skills and experience.

We request that you return the Candidate Questionnaire

by June 15, 2007

 

If you have not yet been contacted to schedule an interview, or if you have questions about the candidate evaluation program, please contact the League office at 206-264-1070.

 

If you have a disability and require accommodation to participate in the candidate evaluation process, please contact the CEC Coordinator at the League office.

 


2007 Candidate Questionnaire

 

SECTION I               

 

BASIC CANDIDATE INFORMATION

 

1.      Name as it will appear on the ballot

 

First Name

Middle Initial or Nick Name

Last Name

Bill

     

Sherman

 

2.   Office sought (include office, jurisdiction, position/district number):

 

King County Prosecuting Attorney

 

3.   Are you the incumbent?                  Yes              No

 

 

4.   How long have you resided in this district/city?

 

Eight years.

 

5.   How long have you resided in King County?

 

Eight years.

 

6.   Is the office sought partisan or nonpartisan?         Partisan      Nonpartisan         

                                                                                                                       

7.   If partisan, please indicate party:  Democratic Party

 

CAMPAIGN CONTACTS

 

 

Campaign Name:

 

Committee to Elect Bill Sherman

 

Address:

 

PO Box 25896

 

City/State/Zip:

 

Seattle, WA 98165

 

Campaign Phone:

 

206-251-6492

 

 

Campaign Fax:

 

206-985-7336

 

 

Campaign E-mail:

 

mail@billsherman.org

 

 

Campaign Website:

 

www.billsherman.org

 

 

POLITICAL BACKGROUND

 

1.   Beginning with the most recent position, please list public offices which you have held.  Include positions on appointive Boards or Commissions.

 

Public Office

Elective or Appointive?

Dates Held

Leadership Role (if any)

Precinct Committee Officer, 43-2254

 

Elective

 

2002-Present

 

n/a

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

 

2.   If you ran for public office but were not elected, please list those races below:

 

Office Title

Year of Run

State Representative, 43rd Legislative District

 

2006

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 


SECTION III

 

In this section, we are seeking responses that reflect the four ratings criteria: involvement, effectiveness, character, and knowledge.  These are defined as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.      In a page or less, why are you running for this office?  (Note: the interview committee will be given a copy of this statement before your interview; at the beginning of your interview you will have the opportunity to expand on this statement in any way you wish.)

 

I believe that justice is fundamentally about protecting the most vulnerable in our community: victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, elder abuse, and identity theft.  I’m running because, as the only current courtroom prosecutor in the race, I know what it takes to keep us safe - and provide support and protection to victims and their families.  I’m running because I want to focus on a few critical priorities:

 

  • Protect Kids and Seniors: A father of two, I will fight for aggressive enforcement against child predators, including online stalkers; work to protect children present during domestic violence; and strengthen prosecution of elder abuse.
  • Juvenile Justice Reform: It’s time to bring an innovative approach to helping our young people avoid crime.  I will work to reform the system to emphasize treatment and dropout prevention.
  • Crack Down on Identity Theft: Too many of us suffer the devastating crime of identity theft. I will hold these criminals accountable.
  • Increase Drug and Mental Health Treatment: I will expand cost-effective approaches for non-violent offenders so we break the cycle of crime.
  • Go After Polluters: A former Clinton Interior Department aide and private sector attorney, I will prosecute those who threaten our health and environmental safety.

 

Overseeing the criminal justice system is an important task, and it requires not just a caretaker or an administrator, but a leader.  As Prosecutor, I will bring a new approach, cutting bureaucracy to focus resources on front-line prosecutors.  And I will remain on the front lines by personally prosecuting at least one case a year.

 

 

 


 

2.      Describe your most important personal characteristics or traits as they relate to the office you seek.

 

I am dogged; curious; and impatient with bureaucracy.  I have worked in public service, off and on, for 17 years, and found that each of these traits is essential.

 

First, I am doggedly persistent.  Whether it is investigating a domestic violence case, working with police officers to obtain evidence necessary to prove a complicated identity theft, or researching legal precedent to support an important point of law, I have found that there is no substitute for perseverance.  Recently, I was concerned that I would not be able to go forward with prosecution on a brutal domestic violence sexual assault – the victim was homeless, and nobody had heard from her in six months.  I called every telephone number in the file, asking questions and finding additional numbers to call.  Finally, I found the number for a homeless shelter she had visited briefly; the manager had no idea where she had gone, but found a slip of paper on which the victim had written her emergency contact information.  It turned out to be her brother, who helped me find her – newly employed, with an apartment, and absolutely ready to testify against her abuser.  We need a Prosecuting Attorney who will be unyielding in the search for justice.

 

Second, I am curious about why things are the way they are, and whether they can be improved.  In the field of criminal justice, there are innovative ideas across the globe – often with data that can help determine if those ideas can work here in King County.  Whether it’s emulating Hawaii’s treatment of drug probation, Missouri’s juvenile corrections system, or Los Angeles County’s environmental crimes strike force, I want to make sure that King County’s criminal justice system adapts with new information and changing times.

 

Finally, I am impatient with bureaucracy for its own sake.  Too often, public agencies ossify because their management assumes that the structure that was created in past decades works just fine.  King County deserves better than just fine.

 

3.      Please describe in sufficient detail, one to three accomplishments or contributions of which you are most proud.  These examples should illustrate effective skills and capabilities you think apply to the office you are seeking.  These accomplishments may have occurred at any time in your personal, professional, or public life. 

In the 1990s, I served as a Special Assistant to U.S. Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt.  As part of Al Gore’s National Performance Review, or “Reinventing Government” initiative, I was asked to supervise a review and reorganization of the Office of the Secretary of Interior, a 700-person agency – approximately 200 people larger than the King County Prosecutor’s Office.  I convened a task force consisting of imaginative, dedicated career employees, and we examined everything the office did – what it did well, what it did poorly, and what systems worked and what did not.  In the end, we produced a reorganization plan that focused on our core competencies, eliminated redundant functions, and saved $10 million per year – and allowed us to do our jobs better.

 

While serving as a prosecutor in the Domestic Violence Unit of the Prosecutor’s Office, I worked with many victims of family violence who refused to cooperate with the police or with our office.  Often this was out of fear of retaliation or economic dependence, but sometimes it was because the victim’s self-esteem had been destroyed by constant abuse.  I prosecuted one case in which the victim was not aware that it was illegal for her husband to threaten to kill her; to blackmail her; and to take her children.  She was terrified of him, but did not believe that her problems amounted to anything.  I sat with her for literally hours on many occasions, talking about what had happened to her, and why she did not have to put up with abuse, and why I believed that she and her kids deserved a life free of fear.  Finally, she said to me, “I think I understand now … I am worth it.”

 

 


 

4.      Please list or describe your current and past activities in the community in which you have acquired skills that relate to the office you seek.  Include your role in the activity and the year(s) in which you were involved.  Involvement consists of many areas such as family, neighborhood, community, employment, or public life.

 

 

 

 

 

    • Board Member, City Year – Seattle/King County, 2002-Present
    • Board Member, King County Conservation Voters, 2006-Present (currently on leave)
    • Vice President, King County Prosecuting Attorneys Association, 2005-2006
    • Member, Ravenna-Bryant Community Association, 2000-Present
    • Member, Legislative Committee, Washington State Bar Association, 2002-2004
    • Member, Bryant Elementary School PTSA, 2005-Present
    • Volunteer, Schools First Coalition
    • Precinct Committee Officer, Legislative District 43, 2002-Present.

 

 

 

 

  1. Please describe the duties of the office you seek.  Which are the most important duties and why?

 

The most important duty of the Prosecuting Attorney is to be fair, impartial, and evenhanded in the administration of justice. I have been proud to go to work every day as one of Norm Maleng’s deputies. I have friends at different prosecuting agencies around the country, and I am well aware that the fair and nonpolitical way Norm ran our office is both precious and rare.  I am dedicated to carrying on Norm’s tradition of blind and impartial justice.

 

More concretely, the Prosecuting Attorney must oversee an office of 500 employees, including approximately 250 lawyers – establishing good working conditions, training and support, a professional environment, and a system of work flow that uses scarce resources effectively.

 

And finally, the Prosecuting Attorney serves as a public advocate in the community – acting as the public’s voice on matters of corruption, justice, and criminal law.  Often, the battle for public awareness and understanding is the most important part of creating a safe and vibrant community.


EDUCATION BACKGROUND SUMMARY

FOR PUBLICATION IN CANDIDATE EVALUATION REPORT

 

The Municipal League’s Candidate Evaluation Report is distributed to voters in print and/or on our website.  It includes a summary of the candidate’s education.  Please summarize your education in 120 characters (letters, punctuation, and space all combined).  The League will delete material that exceeds the space limit by beginning with the last entry.  Suggested order is (degree) (subject) (school) (year, if desired). 

 

Note: If this question is left blank the League will not include education information in your candidate profile.

 

J.D., magna cum laude, University of Michigan

B.A., Wesleyan University

 

CIVIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY

FOR PUBLICATION IN CANDIDATE EVALUATION REPORT

 

The Municipal League’s Candidate Evaluation Report also includes a summary of each candidate’s civic involvement.  Please summarize your civic involvement in the space below.  We will make every attempt to include the information in the Candidate Evaluation Report as submitted.  Due to space restrictions in the Report, your response is limited to 500 characters (letters, punctuation, and spaces all combined).  It is important that you list your involvement beginning with the most important and ending with the least important.  If you exceed the length of response permitted, or if the League should find it necessary to shorten responses for publication purposes, deletions will be made beginning with the last item listed. 

 

Note: This information will appear verbatim on the League’s Candidate Evaluation Report.  If this question is left blank, the Municipal League will not include information on your civic involvement in the Report.

 

  Check here if you would like the Municipal League to copy the first 500 characters from Question 4 to paste into this section.

 

     

 

Finished!

If at all possible, send your response to the Municipal League electronically as an attachment, or insert it into an e-mail message (cec@munileague.org).  Mail and fax numbers are listed below.  If the League has not contacted you to schedule an interview, please call the League office at your earliest convenience.

 

Don’t forget to send the following to the Municipal League:  a resume, a photo, campaign literature, and, if you are an incumbent, constituent newsletters and other materials.  Please use the check-off list on the cover sheet of this packet to indicate which items you have sent.

 

 

THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION AND GOOD LUCK IN YOUR CAMPAIGN!

 

THE MUNICIPAL LEAGUE OF KING COUNTY

 

Candidate Evaluation Coordinator:  Jason Thibedeau

 

810 Third Avenue, Suite 224                 Phone: (206) 264-1070                      Email: cec@munileague.org

Seattle, WA 98104-1614                        Fax: (425) 671-0506                     Website: www.munileague.org