The Municipal League of King County

810 Third Avenue, Suite 224

Seattle, WA 98104

 

2005 Board of Trustees

 

Rita Brogan, Chair

Mark Troxel, Vice Chair

Beth M. Arman, Secretary

Harold Taniguchi, Treasurer

 

Putnam Barber, Executive Alliance

Vaughnetta J. Barton, community volunteer

Jill D. Bowman, Stoel Rives

Patricia Bowman, human resources manager (ret.)

Bruce Carter, judge pro tem, Seattle Municipal Court

Kevin Carter, Safeco

Stephanie Cirkovich, Pike Place Market PDA

Peter Coates, Building and Construction Trades Council

Chris Cooper, CHHIP

Paul Demitriades, Medina City Council (ret.)

Sandra Driscoll, City Attorney (ret)

Deborah Eddy, Consultant

Keven Franklin, King County

Mary Gates, Consultant

Norma Jean Hanson, Norma Jean Hanson Paralegal Services

Robert Klein, McNaul, Ebel, Nawrot, and Helgren

Eric Laschever, Stoel Rives

Steve Marshall, Snohomish PUD

Rob Neate, Puget Sound Energy

Jennifer Piccolo, citizen activist

Charles Redell, Reporter

Tami Ritoch, Fireside Homes Real Estate Associate

R. Todd Slind, CH2MHill

Lucy Steers, public participation consultant

Harold Taniguchi, King County Department of Transportation

Rashelle Tanner, CRISTA Ministries

David Tarshes, Davis Wright Tremaine

Kate Tate, Weyerhauser

Philip Thompson, Perkins Coie

Mark Troxel, City of Seattle

Wes Uhlman, Wes Uhlman & Associates

Rich White, Boeing

2005 CANDIDATE BACKGROUND QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR NON-JUDICIAL CANDIDATES

 

The Municipal League of King County requests every candidate who participates in the candidate evaluation process to submit background information prior to his/her interview with a candidate evaluation committee.  The questionnaire is the basis of the League’s research and interview process.  The League’s ratings are non-partisan; they are based on standards of Involvement, Effectiveness, Character, and Knowledge, all of which have been developed and refined over the past 90 years.

 

A printed version of the questionnaire is available for candidates who prefer to use the traditional format.  To obtain a hard copy, please contact the League office.  A copy of this questionnaire will be provided to Candidate Evaluation Committee members to help them prepare for your interview.  Candidate responses, except the confidential section, will be available to the general public at the League website. 

 

The Municipal League requests the following materials from candidates.  Please check to make certain you have sent in your:

 

      Candidate Questionnaire

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

      Resume (education, employment, and professional activities)

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

               Check here if you DO NOT want your resume posted on the Municipal

                   League website

      Campaign Materials

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

      Constituent Newsletters and other publications

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

      Photograph

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

 

Note: Electronically submitted questionnaires are strongly preferred. All materials can be emailed to rebecca@munileague.org.  They can be processed and made available on-line far more rapidly than handwritten or typed submissions.

 

For non-electronic submissions, please print clearly and legibly and return the application as soon as possible in order to allow the committee the greatest amount of time to prepare a complete report on your skills and experience.

 

If you have not yet been contacted to schedule an interview, or if you have questions about the candidate evaluation program, please contact the League office at 206-264-1070.

 

If you have a disability and require accommodation to participate in the candidate evaluation process, please contact Rebecca Cooper at the League office.

2005 Candidate Questionnaire

 

SECTION I               

 

BASIC CANDIDATE INFORMATION

 

1.      Name as it will appear on the ballot

 

First Name

Middle Initial or Nick Name

Last Name

Alfred

(no middle name)

Runte

 

2.   Office sought (include office, jurisdiction, position/district number):

 

Mayor of Seattle

 

3.   Are you the incumbent?                  Yes              No

 

 

4.   How long have you resided in this district/city?

 

Twenty-five (25) years

 

5.   How long have you resided in King County?

 

Twenty-five (25) years

 

6.   Is the office sought partisan or nonpartisan?         Partisan      Nonpartisan         

                                                                                                                       

7.   If partisan, please indicate party:       

 

CAMPAIGN CONTACTS

 

 

Campaign Name:

 

Friends and Neighbors for Al Runte, Mayor

 

Address:

 

117 East Louisa Street, Box 2006

 

City/State/Zip:

 

Seattle, Washington   98102

 

Campaign Phone:

 

206 325-5185

 

 

Campaign Fax:

 

206 526-5451 (call first, 206 525-3608)

 

 

Campaign E-mail:

 

runte4mayor@earthlink.net

 

 

Campaign Website:

 

www.alrunteformayor.com (not yet operational)

 

 

POLITICAL BACKGROUND

 

1.   Beginning with the most recent position, please list public offices which you have held.  Include positions on appointive Boards or Commissions.

 

Public Office

Elective or Appointive?

Dates Held

Leadership Role (if any)

California State Department of Transportation, Rail Advisory Board

 

Appointed

 

1976-1978

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

 

2.   If you ran for public office but were not elected, please list those races below:

 

Office Title

Year of Run

no offices previously sought

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 


 SECTION III

 

In this section, we are seeking responses that reflect the four ratings criteria: involvement, effectiveness, character, and knowledge.  These are defined as follows:

 

  • Involvement: What has the candidate done previously in family, neighborhood, community, volunteer work, employment or public life to suggest readiness to accomplish challenging objectives? How do these activities demonstrate readiness for the challenges unique to the office sought?

 

  • Effectiveness: Has the candidate demonstrated promise of being productive in the office sought?  Has the candidate shown the ability to work with other people?

 

  • Character: Do the candidate's personal traits show the ability to take on the responsibilities of campaigning for and holding the public office she or he is seeking? Is the candidate a leader, participant or observer?  Is the candidate trustworthy, reliable and candid?

 

  • Knowledge: Has the candidate demonstrated the willingness and ability to learn and adapt?  Does the candidate understand the duties and challenges of the office sought?  Does the candidate have a firm grasp of the issues important to his or her constituency and their potential effects?

 

 

1.      In a page or less, why are you running for this office?  (Note: the interview committee will be given a copy of this statement before your interview; at the beginning of your interview you will have the opportunity to expand on this statement in any way you wish.)

 

    The late Gaylord Nelson once challenged me in a conference on the future of the national parks: "If you don't like your government, look in the mirror."  This year I have.  My concerns for the future of Seattle can no longer be met by my remaining principally a writer and citizen.  Just as Senator Nelson did, my neighbors have been urging me to run for public office.  They, as do I, fear for the future of our city--lack of infrastructure, lack of maintenance, lack of police and fire protection in the neighborhoods.  So far, it is estimated that Seattle's maintenance is at least $500 million in arrears.  During heavy rains, sewage still flows into Lake Washington and Puget Sound.  Elsewhere, city parks are perennially jeopardized by the schemes of land developers--give us your park, we'll give you a bigger tax base.  Until this week, the incumbent never asked developers to contribute to parks.  Until I announced my candidacy, no street in Wedgwood was repaved since 1990.  This week, the repavers have arrived.  This is not responsible government; this is merely playing to the voters. 

     Good schools are another issue.  There is growing in Seattle and other cities the belief that machines are education.  They are not.  Far better than a new a computer is a teacher who loves and cares.  Every child in every neighborhood deserves the same high quality education.  We get there by paying teachers and by insisting that high-paid administrators also teach.  Although this remains principally a state-funding issue, the mayor of Seattle could be doing more.  I will.  As an academic myself, I understand the importance of these issues and where the problems lie. 

    Transportation is also pressing.  Seattle lags far behind most American cities--even in Texas--where light rail is rapidly catching on.  The monorail remains a wonderful vision--for a fair.  Where it fails is in being practical.  Before the monorail can be built, a whole new right-of-way must be created--in the air.  Why not build it on the ground, as does every European city and now all American cities that are building rail?  Instead of building toys--streetcars that go nowhere--how about a master plan for the future that takes Seattle to 2100?  I know; other boards and entities are supposed to be doing this at the state and county level.  The problem of coordination is one the mayor of Seattle needs to address.

    Senator Nelson was right.  The people of Seattle need to look in the mirror and recognize that these problems will not go away. 

 


 

2.      Describe your most important personal characteristics or traits as they relate to the office you seek.

 

     From the time I was three years old, my mother called me the professor.  I have always welcomed the opportunity of bringing people and knowledge together, and, although an academic, have always considered myself an activist.  As early as the age of 19, in 1966, Nancy Ayers, a distinguished Broome County, New York, environmentalist, asked me to serve on her board, that of the Susquehanna Conservation Council.  Together with other civic leaders, we established a broad system of county parks specifically designed for inner-city kids.  Not only do those parks survive, more important, they gave thousands of children hope.  During the summers of 1966-1968, I myself served as a guide, picking up busloads of inner-children and taking them to these parks for the day.  It was the beginning of a life of public service and activism, with the exception of my holding public office. 

     Now that my academic career is behind me--and I can no longer be accused of lacking objectivity--I have decided to run for office in the spirt of that background.  Public service is what I do.  Variously, I have been a teacher, professor, park ranger, government advisor, board member, media commentator, consultant, and citizen activist.  The only thing I have not done is hold public office, which I consider far better than having done nothing else.  We have too many lifetime politicians who are not truly lifetime public servants.  I will be the latter far more than the former, and will listen to all community leaders for a change. 

 

3.      Please describe in sufficient detail, one to three accomplishments or contributions of which you are most proud.  These examples should illustrate effective skills and capabilities you think apply to the office you are seeking.  These accomplishments may have occurred at any time in your personal, professional, or public life. 

 

    In 1958, my father, a factory machinist, died of a heart attack.  I was just 11 years old.  In 1959, my mother took my brother and me on a 10,000 mile camping trip through the national parks.  In 1979, I placed in my mother's hands a first edition of NATIONAL PARKS: THE AMERICAN EXPERIENCE, dedicated to her and my father's memory.  She cried. 

    I believe I know what a real accomplishment is--something that makes a difference.  Just as my mother rose to the challenge of being a single parent--and raising her sons to be honest men--I am now delighted to rise to the challenge of bringing honest government to Seattle.  I can do that because I know that money by itself is not an accomplishment.  It is merely a tool.  Spent wisely, it can bring wonderful things--our camping trip, for example.  Mom did not buy her sons a new television.  We grew up in a household of books, reminded that readers were leaders.  What do I consider my single greatest accomplishment--making my mother proud of me, and being her son. 

    I have written six books and more than three hundred articles.  All of them belong to her.  Seattle will get the benefit of a mayor who believes that knowledge is the greatest accomplishment. 

    In 2004, that knowledge became truly international in my invitation to speak in Brazil.  In 2002, I was invited to serve on the editorial board of a new Brazilian environmental journal, and to write the lead article for the very first issue.  My article spoke to the importance of preservation in an international context.  "A gift composed of land requires vigilance."  This form of vigilance with regard to Seattle's beauty still remains to be seen.  "Money seeks out shopping malls and suburban sprawl rather than conservation."  Brazil understands it; why can't Seattle?  Why do we need a new parking garage at the zoo, a new conference center at the Arboretum?  Eschewing those accomplishments for the real one--preservation--I promise Seattle a future of beauty and open space. 

 


 

 

4.      Please list or describe your current and past activities in the community in which you have acquired skills that relate to the office you seek.  Include your role in the activity and the year(s) in which you were involved.  Involvement consists of many areas such as family, neighborhood, community, employment, or public life.

 

     Just as I was typing this, I received a call from Mount Rainier National Park.  Next week, I am to speak there and direct a workshop for 5th grade educators.  A normal year for me is many such invitations from local, regional, and national forums, including perhaps my favorite--an annual invitation to address the 5th graders at Assumption-St. Bridget School. 

     Invariably, as a historian of the national parks and conservation, I have had considerable experience in the public sector, including guiding the future direction of major bureaucracies and institutions.  National policies with regard to the environment have changed because of my writing.  In my next book, I combine the issues of transportation and the environment, and show that they are not separate.  Rather, they are related, as our friends in Europe and Japan have known for decades.  If Seattle is to become a great international city, it needs to think about the relationship between environment and transportation.

    Family is important, too.  Over the past several years, my aging in-laws have needed my time and care.  My mother-in-law died in January and my father-in-law continues to reside at the Hearthstone.  Suddenly, I have a new expertise--aging, and all the problems it entails.  Over the next several decades, America--including Seattle--will dramatically age.  I am concerned that Seattle is not doing enough as this new "boom" comes upon us. 

 

 

  1. Please describe the duties of the office you seek.  Which are the most important duties and why?

 

     The first duty of the mayor is leadership.  A mayor should inspire the City Council to believe in effective and committed government.  Most important, the mayor should commit the city and its citzens to think in larger blocks of time.  Where will Seattle be in 25 years? 50 years? a hundred years?  What will our snowpack be?  How will we replace that power?  How should we relate to the cities and towns that surround us?  As a historian, I think in time.  I will lead in time, as well. 

     The mayor is foremost the executive leader of city government.  What should its departments be doing?  Are they listening to the citizens, or making bureaucracy more comfortable for themselves?  How is that we tell the difference?  This mayor will not ignore what any citizen knows and sees.  Are the streets being fixed and maintained?  Have the seismic safety improvements to the fire stations really started?  Do the parks look truly inviting or just rundown?  Is consumerism more important than a liveable city?  As the guide to city government, a mayor influences all those issues--and more. 

    A mayor also represents Seattle to the nation and the world.  The world will be proud of my accomplishments on behalf of parks, transportation, and the environment.  The world will believe us when we say we want good government for all our citizens.  Too long, Seattle has listened to only its rich citizens.  The duty of the mayor is to make sure that everyone believes government is there for them. 


 

EDUCATION BACKGROUND SUMMARY

FOR PUBLICATION IN CANDIDATE EVALUATION REPORT

 

The Municipal League’s Candidate Evaluation Report is distributed to voters in print and/or on our website.  It includes a summary of the candidate’s education.  Please summarize your education in 120 characters (letters, punctuation, and space all combined).  The League will delete material that exceeds the space limit by beginning with the last entry.  Suggested order is (degree) (subject) (school) (year, if desired). 

 

Note: If this question is left blank the League will not include education information in your candidate profile.

 

PhD, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1976

MA, Illinois State University, 1971

BA, State University of New York at Binghamton, 1969

 

CIVIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY

FOR PUBLICATION IN CANDIDATE EVALUATION REPORT

 

The Municipal League’s Candidate Evaluation Report also includes a summary of each candidate’s civic involvement.  Please summarize your civic involvement in the space below.  We will make every attempt to include the information in the Candidate Evaluation Report as submitted.  Due to space restrictions in the Report, your response is limited to 500 characters (letters, punctuation, and spaces all combined).  It is important that you list your involvement beginning with the most important and ending with the least important.  If you exceed the length of response permitted, or if the League should find it necessary to shorten responses for publication purposes, deletions will be made beginning with the last item listed. 

 

Note: This information will appear verbatim on the League’s Candidate Evaluation Report.  If this question is left blank, the Municipal League will not include information on your civic involvement in the Report.

 

  Check here if you would like the Municipal League to copy the first 500 characters from Question 4 to paste into this section.

 

     

 

Finished!

If at all possible, send your response to the Municipal League electronically as an attachment, or insert it into an e-mail message (rebecca@munileague.org).  Mail and fax numbers are listed below.  If the League has not contacted you to schedule an interview, please call the League office at your earliest convenience.

 

Don’t forget to send the following to the Municipal League:  a resume, a photo, campaign literature, and, if you are an incumbent, constituent newsletters and other materials.  Please use the check-off list on the cover sheet of this packet to indicate which items you have sent.

 

 

THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION AND GOOD LUCK IN YOUR CAMPAIGN!

 

THE MUNICIPAL LEAGUE OF KING COUNTY

 

Candidate Evaluation Coordinator:  Rebecca Cooper

 

810 Third Avenue, Suite 224                  Phone: 206-264-1070                Email: rebecca@munileague.org

Seattle, WA 98104-1614                        Fax: 425-671-0506                        Website: www.munileague.org