The Municipal League of King County

810 Third Avenue, Suite 224

Seattle, WA 98104

 

2005 Board of Trustees

 

Rita Brogan, Chair

Mark Troxel, Vice Chair

Beth M. Arman, Secretary

Harold Taniguchi, Treasurer

 

Putnam Barber, Executive Alliance

Vaughnetta J. Barton, community volunteer

Jill D. Bowman, Stoel Rives

Patricia Bowman, human resources manager (ret.)

Bruce Carter, judge pro tem, Seattle Municipal Court

Kevin Carter, Safeco

Stephanie Cirkovich, Pike Place Market PDA

Peter Coates, Building and Construction Trades Council

Chris Cooper, CHHIP

Paul Demitriades, Medina City Council (ret.)

Sandra Driscoll, City Attorney (ret)

Deborah Eddy, Consultant

Keven Franklin, King County

Mary Gates, Consultant

Norma Jean Hanson, Norma Jean Hanson Paralegal Services

Robert Klein, McNaul, Ebel, Nawrot, and Helgren

Eric Laschever, Stoel Rives

Steve Marshall, Snohomish PUD

Rob Neate, Puget Sound Energy

Jennifer Piccolo, citizen activist

Charles Redell, Reporter

Tami Ritoch, Fireside Homes Real Estate Associate

R. Todd Slind, CH2MHill

Lucy Steers, public participation consultant

Harold Taniguchi, King County Department of Transportation

Rashelle Tanner, CRISTA Ministries

David Tarshes, Davis Wright Tremaine

Kate Tate, Weyerhauser

Philip Thompson, Perkins Coie

Mark Troxel, City of Seattle

Wes Uhlman, Wes Uhlman & Associates

Rich White, Boeing

2005 CANDIDATE BACKGROUND QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR NON-JUDICIAL CANDIDATES

 

The Municipal League of King County requests every candidate who participates in the candidate evaluation process to submit background information prior to his/her interview with a candidate evaluation committee.  The questionnaire is the basis of the League’s research and interview process.  The League’s ratings are non-partisan; they are based on standards of Involvement, Effectiveness, Character, and Knowledge, all of which have been developed and refined over the past 90 years.

 

A printed version of the questionnaire is available for candidates who prefer to use the traditional format.  To obtain a hard copy, please contact the League office.  A copy of this questionnaire will be provided to Candidate Evaluation Committee members to help them prepare for your interview.  Candidate responses, except the confidential section, will be available to the general public at the League website. 

 

The Municipal League requests the following materials from candidates.  Please check to make certain you have sent in your:

 

      Candidate Questionnaire

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

      Resume (education, employment, and professional activities)

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

               Check here if you DO NOT want your resume posted on the Municipal

                   League website

      Campaign Materials

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

      Constituent Newsletters and other publications

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

      Photograph

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

 

Note: Electronically submitted questionnaires are strongly preferred. All materials can be emailed to rebecca@munileague.org.  They can be processed and made available on-line far more rapidly than handwritten or typed submissions.

 

For non-electronic submissions, please print clearly and legibly and return the application as soon as possible in order to allow the committee the greatest amount of time to prepare a complete report on your skills and experience.

 

If you have not yet been contacted to schedule an interview, or if you have questions about the candidate evaluation program, please contact the League office at 206-264-1070.

 

If you have a disability and require accommodation to participate in the candidate evaluation process, please contact Rebecca Cooper at the League office.

2005 Candidate Questionnaire

 

SECTION I               

 

BASIC CANDIDATE INFORMATION

 

1.      Name as it will appear on the ballot

 

First Name

Middle Initial or Nick Name

Last Name

Beth

E

Goldberg

 

2.   Office sought (include office, jurisdiction, position/district number):

 

Seattle Monorail Board, Position 8

 

3.   Are you the incumbent?                  Yes              No

 

 

4.   How long have you resided in this district/city?

 

12 years

 

5.   How long have you resided in King County?

 

12 years

 

6.   Is the office sought partisan or nonpartisan?         Partisan      Nonpartisan         

                                                                                                                       

7.   If partisan, please indicate party:       

 

CAMPAIGN CONTACTS

 

 

Campaign Name:

 

Beth Goldberg for Monorail Board

 

Address:

 

6025 25th Ave NE

 

City/State/Zip:

 

Seattle, WA  98115

 

Campaign Phone:

 

206/406-3423

 

 

Campaign Fax:

 

n/a

 

 

Campaign E-mail:

 

bgberg@speakeasy.net

 

 

Campaign Website:

 

bethgoldberg.com

 

 

POLITICAL BACKGROUND

 

1.   Beginning with the most recent position, please list public offices which you have held.  Include positions on appointive Boards or Commissions.

 

Public Office

Elective or Appointive?

Dates Held

Leadership Role (if any)

n/a

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

 

2.   If you ran for public office but were not elected, please list those races below:

 

Office Title

Year of Run

n/a

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 


 


SECTION III

 

In this section, we are seeking responses that reflect the four ratings criteria: involvement, effectiveness, character, and knowledge.  These are defined as follows:

 

  • Involvement: What has the candidate done previously in family, neighborhood, community, volunteer work, employment or public life to suggest readiness to accomplish challenging objectives? How do these activities demonstrate readiness for the challenges unique to the office sought?

 

  • Effectiveness: Has the candidate demonstrated promise of being productive in the office sought?  Has the candidate shown the ability to work with other people?

 

  • Character: Do the candidate's personal traits show the ability to take on the responsibilities of campaigning for and holding the public office she or he is seeking? Is the candidate a leader, participant or observer?  Is the candidate trustworthy, reliable and candid?

 

  • Knowledge: Has the candidate demonstrated the willingness and ability to learn and adapt?  Does the candidate understand the duties and challenges of the office sought?  Does the candidate have a firm grasp of the issues important to his or her constituency and their potential effects?

 

 

1.      In a page or less, why are you running for this office?  (Note: the interview committee will be given a copy of this statement before your interview; at the beginning of your interview you will have the opportunity to expand on this statement in any way you wish.)

 

The Seattle Monorail Project is in disarray.  Revenue forecasts have proven wildly optimistic.  Cost estimates are hundreds of millions of dollars over budget.  And outlandish consultant and attorney fees have contributed to an accumulated debt of $110 million before construction has even begun.

            The monorail board has been asleep at the switch.  Staff didn't disclose the revenue problem to the board for months. Staff lobbied to change state law without board knowledge or approval. Staff covered up cost overruns for five months.  Even with all of these danger signs, the Board went blithely along.

            Right now, the monorail collects $1 million per week from Seattle taxpayers.  Project finances and feasibility must be appraised in the cold light of day. Either it will deliver the system promised to voters, or we must shut down the agency.  Unfortunately, the current board lacks the expertise and leadership to successfully manage either of these tasks.

            I have spent my career overseeing multimillion dollar budgets. I currently supervise the METRO transit operating budget.  In my nine years at the King County Office of Management and Budget, I have worked to fund critical criminal justice programs like the County Sheriff and Prosecuting Attorney.

•      I will oppose any crazy 50-year "creative financing" tax plans.

•      I will not support half a monorail, or anything less than the plan promised voters.

•      I will quickly evaluate project viability.  If the project cannot meet its promises, I will immediately end the tax and liquidate purchased real estate to recover taxpayer equity.

I would appreciate your vote.     

 


 

2.      Describe your most important personal characteristics or traits as they relate to the office you seek.

 

The most important skill I bring to the Monorail Board is strong fiscal management and analysis skills.  I have nearly a decade of experience working in the King County Office of Management & Budget.  During this time I have handled some of the toughest assignments in the office, managing criminal justice funds through the 2001-2004 budget crisis and Ridgway/Green River Killer prosecution. My job has necessitated asking unpopular and difficult questions, scrutinizing agency cost and revenue estimates in a highly charged political environment. 

 

Our work in the budget office has a simple objective to serve the overall fiscal interests of the County.  I think the monorail project would benefit from my experience.

 

3.      Please describe in sufficient detail, one to three accomplishments or contributions of which you are most proud.  These examples should illustrate effective skills and capabilities you think apply to the office you are seeking.  These accomplishments may have occurred at any time in your personal, professional, or public life. 

 

Four years ago Gary Ridgway was arrested and charged as the Green River Killer.  After two years of intensive trial preperation and investigation, Ridgway plead guilty in November 2003.  During this time, I managed county preparation for the financially impossible: prosecution of the most complex criminal case in american history.

 

King County was already in serious trouble before DNA testing implicated Ridgway.  Two years earlier I was responsible for the county's implementation of Initiative 695 criminal justice reductions.  The $30 car tab measure eliminated the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax, also gutting public health and transportation funding.   Days before Ridgway was arrested, voters approved Initiative 747, dramatically reducing projected county property taxes.  Coupled with the dot com implosion and a full-blown recession, we faced deficit that was ultimately equal to 27 percent of expenditures.

 

As the budget office’s criminal justice supervisor, together with a staff of five budget analysts I was responsible for managing all facets of the Ridgway budget.  We faced enormous costs from multiple agencies.  The Sheriff’s Office spent millions investigating both Ridgway and establishing the relevance of the dozens of unsolved cases from this period.  The Prosecuting Attorney’s Office spent millions more filing charges and preparing the case for trial.  Under state law, the county is responsible for public defense costs, which would also run in the millions for this case.  And even Superior Court costs swelled in preparation for the special security needs of such a high-profile case.

 

Clearly there was a strong public interest in justice in this case, but at a time of draconian budget cuts, every dollar spent on Ridgway came at a real human cost of layoffs and service reductions.  For two years I worked with the various agencies involved in this case trying to keep down costs while fully funding the case.  I was at various times collaborative and adversarial, scrutinizing each and every expenditure for potential savings.  And just as we reached agreement with an agency, the process would start again to secure county council approval.

 

Extraordinary circumstances are often the catalyst for innovation.  We made particular progress with electronic records management in this case as we coped with 19 years of police reports mixed with volumes of forensic and medical evidence.  In the end, however, this budget problem was solved mainly with hard work and attention to detail, something I believe is missing on the monorail board. 


 

 

4.      Please list or describe your current and past activities in the community in which you have acquired skills that relate to the office you seek.  Include your role in the activity and the year(s) in which you were involved.  Involvement consists of many areas such as family, neighborhood, community, employment, or public life.

 

I applied and developed my management skills in the following settings:

 

1)  In my positions with the King County Office of Management & Budget (1996-present).  I have  served as budget analyst or managed budget analysts for a diverse set of functions, including criminal justice, health and human services, transportation, and utilities and natural resources. 

2)  Serving on the Board of Directors as a member and later as President for the Hutch Kids Child Care Center (2001-2003).  Hutch Kids was facing a loss of some revenue that required careful and regular scrutiny of all aspects of the budget.  I worked with the board and with Hutch Kids staff to put in place budget monitoring systems.  I also worked  with board and staff members to develop more accurate cost and revenue forecasting.  This allowed the board to establish rate increases that were palatable to the families that use Hutch Kids while facilitating the appropriate fiscal environment for a top-notch childcare facility.   

 

Ability to work on volunteer boards and serve as liason to broader community:

1)  Served on the Hutch Kids Child Care Center Board of Directors one year as a member and one year as president (2001 - 2003).  During my term as president I spearheaded an effort to update the organization's outdated by-laws.  The revised by-laws were unanimously approved by the board and remain in place today.   

2)  Served on the Graduate School of Public Affairs (now the Evans School) Student Organization as student representative (1993-1994) and as president (1994-1995).  Among my responsibilties was to act as a liason between the students and the school's faculty.

 

 

  1. Please describe the duties of the office you seek.  Which are the most important duties and why?

 

It's a simple job: oversee the monorail project.  The board's website lists the following goals and responsibilities:

 

on-time

under budget

break-even operations

excellent design

true grassroots history

transparency and accoutnability to the public

 

 

I think any objective assessment would conclude that the board has failed to achive most if not all of these goals.  As a board member, I will act in the public interest to review the work of agency staff.  I will hold the board, staff, and consultants to the highest standard of honesty, integrity, and transparency.  And I will never forget that $1 million per week is being collected from Seattle families to support the project. 

 

Promises to the public must either be kept, or the project must be terminated immediately.  This was how the project was framed three years ago, and this will be my mission as a board member.


EDUCATION BACKGROUND SUMMARY

FOR PUBLICATION IN CANDIDATE EVALUATION REPORT

 

The Municipal League’s Candidate Evaluation Report is distributed to voters in print and/or on our website.  It includes a summary of the candidate’s education.  Please summarize your education in 120 characters (letters, punctuation, and space all combined).  The League will delete material that exceeds the space limit by beginning with the last entry.  Suggested order is (degree) (subject) (school) (year, if desired). 

 

Note: If this question is left blank the League will not include education information in your candidate profile.

 

Bachelors Degree in International Relations with Honors, University of California, Davis, 1991

Masters Degree in Public Administration, University of Washington, 1995

 

CIVIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY

FOR PUBLICATION IN CANDIDATE EVALUATION REPORT

 

The Municipal League’s Candidate Evaluation Report also includes a summary of each candidate’s civic involvement.  Please summarize your civic involvement in the space below.  We will make every attempt to include the information in the Candidate Evaluation Report as submitted.  Due to space restrictions in the Report, your response is limited to 500 characters (letters, punctuation, and spaces all combined).  It is important that you list your involvement beginning with the most important and ending with the least important.  If you exceed the length of response permitted, or if the League should find it necessary to shorten responses for publication purposes, deletions will be made beginning with the last item listed. 

 

Note: This information will appear verbatim on the League’s Candidate Evaluation Report.  If this question is left blank, the Municipal League will not include information on your civic involvement in the Report.

 

  Check here if you would like the Municipal League to copy the first 500 characters from Question 4 to paste into this section.

 

     

 

Finished!

If at all possible, send your response to the Municipal League electronically as an attachment, or insert it into an e-mail message (rebecca@munileague.org).  Mail and fax numbers are listed below.  If the League has not contacted you to schedule an interview, please call the League office at your earliest convenience.

 

Don’t forget to send the following to the Municipal League:  a resume, a photo, campaign literature, and, if you are an incumbent, constituent newsletters and other materials.  Please use the check-off list on the cover sheet of this packet to indicate which items you have sent.

 

 

THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION AND GOOD LUCK IN YOUR CAMPAIGN!

 

THE MUNICIPAL LEAGUE OF KING COUNTY

 

Candidate Evaluation Coordinator:  Rebecca Cooper

 

810 Third Avenue, Suite 224                  Phone: 206-264-1070                Email: rebecca@munileague.org

Seattle, WA 98104-1614                        Fax: 425-671-0506                        Website: www.munileague.org