The Municipal League of King County

810 Third Avenue, Suite 224

Seattle, WA 98104

 

2005 Board of Trustees

 

Rita Brogan, Chair

Mark Troxel, Vice Chair

Beth M. Arman, Secretary

Harold Taniguchi, Treasurer

 

Putnam Barber, Executive Alliance

Vaughnetta J. Barton, community volunteer

Jill D. Bowman, Stoel Rives

Patricia Bowman, human resources manager (ret.)

Bruce Carter, judge pro tem, Seattle Municipal Court

Kevin Carter, Safeco

Stephanie Cirkovich, Pike Place Market PDA

Peter Coates, Building and Construction Trades Council

Chris Cooper, CHHIP

Paul Demitriades, Medina City Council (ret.)

Sandra Driscoll, City Attorney (ret)

Deborah Eddy, Consultant

Keven Franklin, King County

Mary Gates, Consultant

Norma Jean Hanson, Norma Jean Hanson Paralegal Services

Robert Klein, McNaul, Ebel, Nawrot, and Helgren

Eric Laschever, Stoel Rives

Steve Marshall, Snohomish PUD

Rob Neate, Puget Sound Energy

Jennifer Piccolo, citizen activist

Charles Redell, Reporter

Tami Ritoch, Fireside Homes Real Estate Associate

R. Todd Slind, CH2MHill

Lucy Steers, public participation consultant

Harold Taniguchi, King County Department of Transportation

Rashelle Tanner, CRISTA Ministries

David Tarshes, Davis Wright Tremaine

Kate Tate, Weyerhauser

Philip Thompson, Perkins Coie

Mark Troxel, City of Seattle

Wes Uhlman, Wes Uhlman & Associates

Rich White, Boeing

2005 CANDIDATE BACKGROUND QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR NON-JUDICIAL CANDIDATES

 

The Municipal League of King County requests every candidate who participates in the candidate evaluation process to submit background information prior to his/her interview with a candidate evaluation committee.  The questionnaire is the basis of the League’s research and interview process.  The League’s ratings are non-partisan; they are based on standards of Involvement, Effectiveness, Character, and Knowledge, all of which have been developed and refined over the past 90 years.

 

A printed version of the questionnaire is available for candidates who prefer to use the traditional format.  To obtain a hard copy, please contact the League office.  A copy of this questionnaire will be provided to Candidate Evaluation Committee members to help them prepare for your interview.  Candidate responses, except the confidential section, will be available to the general public at the League website. 

 

The Municipal League requests the following materials from candidates.  Please check to make certain you have sent in your:

 

      Candidate Questionnaire

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

      Resume (education, employment, and professional activities)

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

               Check here if you DO NOT want your resume posted on the Municipal

                   League website

      Campaign Materials

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

      Constituent Newsletters and other publications

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

      Photograph

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

 

Note: Electronically submitted questionnaires are strongly preferred. All materials can be emailed to rebecca@munileague.org.  They can be processed and made available on-line far more rapidly than handwritten or typed submissions.

 

For non-electronic submissions, please print clearly and legibly and return the application as soon as possible in order to allow the committee the greatest amount of time to prepare a complete report on your skills and experience.

 

If you have not yet been contacted to schedule an interview, or if you have questions about the candidate evaluation program, please contact the League office at 206-264-1070.

 

If you have a disability and require accommodation to participate in the candidate evaluation process, please contact Rebecca Cooper at the League office.

2005 Candidate Questionnaire

 

SECTION I               

 

BASIC CANDIDATE INFORMATION

 

1.      Name as it will appear on the ballot

 

First Name

Middle Initial or Nick Name

Last Name

Suzette

     

Cooke

 

2.   Office sought (include office, jurisdiction, position/district number):

 

Mayor, Kent

 

3.   Are you the incumbent?                  Yes              No

 

 

4.   How long have you resided in this district/city?

 

30 years in Kent area, 8 years in city limits

 

5.   How long have you resided in King County?

 

33 years

 

6.   Is the office sought partisan or nonpartisan?         Partisan      Nonpartisan         

                                                                                                                       

7.   If partisan, please indicate party:       

 

CAMPAIGN CONTACTS

 

 

Campaign Name:

 

Suzette Cooke for Mayor

 

Address:

 

25307 144th Ave SE

 

City/State/Zip:

 

Kent/WA/98042

 

Campaign Phone:

 

253-631-5021

 

 

Campaign Fax:

 

253-631-5021

 

 

Campaign E-mail:

 

suzette@suzettecooke.org

 

 

Campaign Website:

 

www.suzettecooke.org

 

 

POLITICAL BACKGROUND

 

1.   Beginning with the most recent position, please list public offices which you have held.  Include positions on appointive Boards or Commissions.

 

Public Office

Elective or Appointive?

Dates Held

Leadership Role (if any)

WA State Representative

 

Elected

 

12/1992-1/1999

 

Chair, Children & Family Services Committee

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

state's lead on welfare reform

 

Precinct Committee Officer

 

Elected

 

1993-1994

 

     

 

 

2.   If you ran for public office but were not elected, please list those races below:

 

Office Title

Year of Run

King County Executive

 

1997

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 


 SECTION III

 

In this section, we are seeking responses that reflect the four ratings criteria: involvement, effectiveness, character, and knowledge.  These are defined as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.      In a page or less, why are you running for this office?  (Note: the interview committee will be given a copy of this statement before your interview; at the beginning of your interview you will have the opportunity to expand on this statement in any way you wish.)

 

I want to be Kent Mayor because I can:

•     Improve people’s lives;

•     Guide Kent’s growth as an urban center while maintaining a safe, family-friendly atmosphere - help ensure the next generation can and wants to stay in Kent;

•     Prioritize city services and projects through citizen input, performance audits and the budget process;

•     Develop and promote an image makeover with which residents and businesses can positively identify;

•     Clean up and rejuvenate the city’s commercial areas to attract more shopping choices in goods and quality;

•     Help secure high wage jobs and national recognition through developing the Center for Advanced Manufacturing;

•     Tune up the development permit process so it is more predictable and user-friendly for all sizes of projects;

•     Relate well to people of diverse ethnicity and national origins, especially after having lived and worked for one year under a military regime in Greece; and

•     Protect and better recognize neighborhoods, and engage the residents in city communications and activities.

 

Additionally, my husband and I have a vested interest in the city’s future: our commercial printing business is located in the Kent Valley. With 60 employees, we are the third largest family-owned printing business in Puget Sound.

 

Kent needs a mayor with vision, strong budget and management skills, a working understanding of business and political structures, a passion for community betterment, and an effective communication style. I am a great fit. I have a broad background in leadership and management as a government employee for four cities, a state elected official, chief executive officer for two non-profit organizations and a business owner. I have proved that I can translate listening and learning into action, and now I want Kent to directly benefit from all I have to offer.

 


 

2.      Describe your most important personal characteristics or traits as they relate to the office you seek.

 

•     Honest: the public needs to know that what they hear and see is the truth. This also encourages honesty in return from employees and other elected officials.

•     Trustworthy & dependable: I follow through with what I say I will do, and I attempt to not make promises I cannot keep.

•     Approachable: I help people feel at ease in one-on-one communications, group discussions and formal public hearings. (I received many compliments on the way I conducted public hearings in the House Children & Family Services Committee. Even if a person disagreed with my position, I coached them on how to be succinct and helped them clarify their testimony.)

•     Practical: Does a project, event, policy or regulation add sufficient value for the time and cost to implement it? Does it make sense to the people it affects? Can the city enforce it?

•     Can-do attitude: After determining there is an interest or need for something, I approach the topic with “how can we make this happen,” not “can we make this happen.”

•     Respectful of people and their differences: I have socialized and worked with people who have different national origins, religions, ages, physical and mental abilities, and sexual orientation. I sought commonality across political party lines, and encouraged discourse on minority opinions at board meetings.

•     Interactive listener: I want to ensure I understand not only what is being said – in the speaker’s mind, but how it translates into action.

•     Tenacious: If something is of value to accomplish, I have the patience to keep at it. Success may come with a different approach or when key parties change. A prime example is welfare reform. For four years Governor Lowry would not consider it; but Gov. Locke was open to changing our state system.

•     Dignified – as a mayor should be when the occasion calls for it.

•     Organized: I have regularly developed one- and three-year plans with timelines, action steps, responsible parties and outcomes.

•     Initiator and collaborator: I am adept at bringing individuals or groups together to develop policies, plan projects and get things done.

•     Oratory: I like public speaking and informal public forums.

 

3.      Please describe in sufficient detail, one to three accomplishments or contributions of which you are most proud.  These examples should illustrate effective skills and capabilities you think apply to the office you are seeking.  These accomplishments may have occurred at any time in your personal, professional, or public life. 

 

1. Washington State’s welfare reform laws (WorkFirst), 1994, 1997, and 1998

I had been a State Representative for only a month when the Speaker of the House appointed me to take the policy lead on reforming our state’s welfare system. Public views ranged from providing more services and money to families to cutting everyone off immediately. I was swimming in a morass of layered regulations – state and federal from numerous government agencies - administered by the largest bureaucracy in the state. I did my homework. I met with caseworkers, hundreds of welfare recipients from different circumstances and with varying levels of need, human service advocates, labor and business leaders, community-based organizations, other states’ legislators, congressional members and federal staff, etc. To facilitate open and frank discussions, I typically met recipients and their family in their home or a comfortable location of their choice. I “walked a mile in their shoes,” living on a food stamp budget for a month, and job shadowed a CPS caseworker. I debated the topic around the state – including opposite the Governor - in public forums, editorial boards, on radio and TV. I was picketed in downtown Kent and received written and verbal death threats from parents who did not want to pay child support. I sorted the truth from fiction and applied a dose of practicality as I sought to gain support from political parties, labor and business, the Senate and the Governor. After researching welfare reform attempts across the nation, I knew that for true reform to work the Governor had to have ownership. My 1997 WorkFirst bill left the House with bi-partisan support. I am proud that the welfare reform bills I sponsored were signed into law under Gov. Locke, and appear to be helping children and families today.

 

2. Revised Kent’s building permit process, 1981 - 1982

In 1981 Kent had the reputation as being the worst place for building development. As the Chamber’s executive, I established a task force that met semi-monthly for nine months to revise the city’s development permits process. Six members were carefully selected to represent different building interests, and the seventh was the Kent City Administrator. I arranged for outside speakers at each meeting to identify problems and seek best practices. Prior to publishing our recommendations, we met with individual department heads to secure their buy-in. Since the city administrator fully participated from the beginning, the city implemented most of our recommendations. Kent then began to attract higher quality commercial and residential projects.

 

3. Burien Clean Sweep, 1999 & 2000

With members of the Burien Business Partnership, city leaders and staff, I initiated Burien Clean Sweep. Residents of all ages and community groups joined us to clean storm drains and sidewalks, scrub out or paint over graffiti, collect tons of refuse for the dump, trim the street trees and plant flower pots and hanging baskets downtown and along major arterials. Businesses provided breakfast and lunch in the fire station bays. We attracted over 400 volunteers the second year and residents wanted to expand the program into their neighborhoods. Clean Sweep has been successful (and copied by other jurisdictions) in attracting business downtown and generating community pride.     


 

4.      Please list or describe your current and past activities in the community in which you have acquired skills that relate to the office you seek.  Include your role in the activity and the year(s) in which you were involved.  Involvement consists of many areas such as family, neighborhood, community, employment, or public life.

 

In addition to the following, please refer to my resume and the attachment, “Suzette Cooke: Community Service”

 

Washington State Representative, District 47, 12/1992 – 1/1999

Chaired several committees, helped write the state budget and pension policies, and led statewide effort to reform welfare

 

Executive Director, Kent Chamber of Commerce, 4/1981 – 5/1992

•           Attended weekly city council meetings and workshops for 11 years, testified at public hearings and lobbied council members about business issues

•           Appointed to numerous committees and task forces concerning city plans, policies and projects: I gained intimate knowledge of the city budget, comprehensive plans and zoning, water quality and quantity issues, surface water drainage, road projects and transportation plans, traffic mitigation policies and fees, the development permit process and economic development

•           Established the Kent (Chamber) Community Foundation for privately funding public education and the arts, and initiated the Kent Winterfest Parade

•           Registered as a state lobbyist and served as a board member on two statewide business organizations

 

Director, Kent Senior Activity Center, City of Kent Parks Dept., 2/1975 – 4/1981

I wrote 2-year operational budgets, secured federal and state grants, conducted a detailed personnel performance audit, worked with city council members and participated in numerous city committees and projects, such as:

•           Promotion and hiring assessment centers for police and fire personnel, 1979-1982

•           King County organization for senior center directors, organizer, 1976 - 1981

•           Committee to establish Kent’s recycling program, staff lead, 1980

•           Kent Saturday Market, supervisor, 1979-1980

•           King County’s Housing Rehabilitation Advisory Committee, 1979

•           Facility planning committee for building the Kent Commons, 1976-1977

 

Economic development manager, City of Burien, 4/1999 – 5/2001

Implemented rudimentary steps to attract business:

•           Established and published a city identity marketing packet with website support

•           Initiated Burien Clean Sweep with over 400 volunteers

 

President/CEO, Greater Renton Chamber of Commerce, 7/2001 – 9/2004

•           Stakeholder in the Renton- Ahead of the Curve” community marketing campaign

•           Member of the Blue Ribbon Committee, Renton’s think tank for business, government, education and civic leaders

 

 

  1. Please describe the duties of the office you seek.  Which are the most important duties and why?

 

There are many parallels between the responsibilities of mayor and the role I played as chief executive officer for two chambers of commerce. In a loose analogy, the Kent mayor serves by the will of the voters as the CEO of an 85,000-member non-profit organization. The city’s elected board of directors, the 7-member city council, represents the citizenry when setting policies, approving services and projects, and enacting ordinances, and city staff implements their decisions. Just as any good CEO, the mayor recommends policies and activities for consideration by the council, works with the council president in setting meeting agendas, and influences council members’ votes through persuasion. Communicating with city council members is one of the most important roles for a mayor to be successful in a strong mayor form of government. Without council support, the mayor’s innovative programs that require council action will never take root.

 

The mayor’s role as an employer - in hiring, being clear on job expectations, and signing union and service contracts - and is as important as council communications. Unlike the current administration, I will have the department directors report to me. The chief operating officer will still be responsible for managing the details, but I consider department heads as my management team. Their insights into what it will take to implement projects are critical. The city will run more efficiently and effectively when department personnel understand an outcome and feel vested in it. Additionally, the mayor’s appointments of people to commissions, boards and committees will influence the effectiveness of the groups in truly representing constituent interests.

 

The one duty that can make or break anything a mayor wants to accomplish is the budget. Writing the budget and managing the city’s finances is shared by many parties, but the ultimate responsibility lies with the mayor. In order to keep taxes and fees reasonably low, the budget must be based on realistic estimates for expenditures and revenues, incorporate reserve funds for equipment replacement and economic emergencies, and expose future liabilities. (This will be the first budget I will not have to develop myself.)

 

The mayor serves as the most visible representative of the city, not only to its residents, businesses and government employees, but also as a regional powerbroker. Kent has much to offer – and to gain – with the mayor’s participation in regional, state and federal legislative and planning bodies. This sets the mayor up as a “lobbyist” for decisions that will benefit Kent. Additionally, Kent will benefit by continuing our collaboration with neighboring cities and King County.

 

And last but not least, the mayor has a duty as a leader to formulate a vision for Kent, today and 40 years from now, that serves as the parameter for decisions. (Leadership from the mayor is the number one request from city staff.) I am eager to work with the city council and lead the public discussion toward updating Kent’s vision. The result will serve as a springboard to a public image makeover and stronger Kent identity that will benefit citizens and businesses.


EDUCATION BACKGROUND SUMMARY

FOR PUBLICATION IN CANDIDATE EVALUATION REPORT

 

The Municipal League’s Candidate Evaluation Report is distributed to voters in print and/or on our website.  It includes a summary of the candidate’s education.  Please summarize your education in 120 characters (letters, punctuation, and space all combined).  The League will delete material that exceeds the space limit by beginning with the last entry.  Suggested order is (degree) (subject) (school) (year, if desired). 

 

Note: If this question is left blank the League will not include education information in your candidate profile.

 

BA, Recreation Admin, WWSC, 1972; business courses, UPS & San Jose SU, 1978-90; Kent & King Co Citizen Police Academies

 

CIVIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY

FOR PUBLICATION IN CANDIDATE EVALUATION REPORT

 

The Municipal League’s Candidate Evaluation Report also includes a summary of each candidate’s civic involvement.  Please summarize your civic involvement in the space below.  We will make every attempt to include the information in the Candidate Evaluation Report as submitted.  Due to space restrictions in the Report, your response is limited to 500 characters (letters, punctuation, and spaces all combined).  It is important that you list your involvement beginning with the most important and ending with the least important.  If you exceed the length of response permitted, or if the League should find it necessary to shorten responses for publication purposes, deletions will be made beginning with the last item listed. 

 

Note: This information will appear verbatim on the League’s Candidate Evaluation Report.  If this question is left blank, the Municipal League will not include information on your civic involvement in the Report.

 

  Check here if you would like the Municipal League to copy the first 500 characters from Question 4 to paste into this section.

 

WA State Representative 3 terms: budget, pensions, chaired Children & Family Services Committee, led state welfare reform; Kent Chamber of Commerce executive director 11 yrs; Kent Senior Center director 6 yrs; Kent Saturday Market supervisor 2 yrs; Kent-Sunrise Rotary Club charter president; established the Kent Community Foundation & Winterfest Parade; Assessment Center member for Kent police & fire personnel decisions; Renton Technical College Foundation president; Kent Schools Futures Club

 

Finished!

If at all possible, send your response to the Municipal League electronically as an attachment, or insert it into an e-mail message (rebecca@munileague.org).  Mail and fax numbers are listed below.  If the League has not contacted you to schedule an interview, please call the League office at your earliest convenience.

 

Don’t forget to send the following to the Municipal League:  a resume, a photo, campaign literature, and, if you are an incumbent, constituent newsletters and other materials.  Please use the check-off list on the cover sheet of this packet to indicate which items you have sent.

 

 

THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION AND GOOD LUCK IN YOUR CAMPAIGN!

 

THE MUNICIPAL LEAGUE OF KING COUNTY

 

Candidate Evaluation Coordinator:  Rebecca Cooper

 

810 Third Avenue, Suite 224                  Phone: 206-264-1070                Email: rebecca@munileague.org

Seattle, WA 98104-1614                        Fax: 425-671-0506                        Website: www.munileague.org