The Municipal League of King County

810 Third Avenue, Suite 224

Seattle, WA 98104

 

2005 Board of Trustees

 

Rita Brogan, Chair

Mark Troxel, Vice Chair

Beth M. Arman, Secretary

Harold Taniguchi, Treasurer

 

Putnam Barber, Executive Alliance

Vaughnetta J. Barton, community volunteer

Jill D. Bowman, Stoel Rives

Patricia Bowman, human resources manager (ret.)

Bruce Carter, judge pro tem, Seattle Municipal Court

Kevin Carter, Safeco

Stephanie Cirkovich, Pike Place Market PDA

Peter Coates, Building and Construction Trades Council

Chris Cooper, CHHIP

Paul Demitriades, Medina City Council (ret.)

Sandra Driscoll, City Attorney (ret)

Deborah Eddy, Consultant

Keven Franklin, King County

Mary Gates, Consultant

Norma Jean Hanson, Norma Jean Hanson Paralegal Services

Robert Klein, McNaul, Ebel, Nawrot, and Helgren

Eric Laschever, Stoel Rives

Steve Marshall, Snohomish PUD

Rob Neate, Puget Sound Energy

Jennifer Piccolo, citizen activist

Charles Redell, Reporter

Tami Ritoch, Fireside Homes Real Estate Associate

R. Todd Slind, CH2MHill

Lucy Steers, public participation consultant

Harold Taniguchi, King County Department of Transportation

Rashelle Tanner, CRISTA Ministries

David Tarshes, Davis Wright Tremaine

Kate Tate, Weyerhauser

Philip Thompson, Perkins Coie

Mark Troxel, City of Seattle

Wes Uhlman, Wes Uhlman & Associates

Rich White, Boeing

2005 CANDIDATE BACKGROUND QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR NON-JUDICIAL CANDIDATES

 

The Municipal League of King County requests every candidate who participates in the candidate evaluation process to submit background information prior to his/her interview with a candidate evaluation committee.  The questionnaire is the basis of the League’s research and interview process.  The League’s ratings are non-partisan; they are based on standards of Involvement, Effectiveness, Character, and Knowledge, all of which have been developed and refined over the past 90 years.

 

A printed version of the questionnaire is available for candidates who prefer to use the traditional format.  To obtain a hard copy, please contact the League office.  A copy of this questionnaire will be provided to Candidate Evaluation Committee members to help them prepare for your interview.  Candidate responses, except the confidential section, will be available to the general public at the League website. 

 

The Municipal League requests the following materials from candidates.  Please check to make certain you have sent in your:

 

      Candidate Questionnaire

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

      Resume (education, employment, and professional activities)

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

               Check here if you DO NOT want your resume posted on the Municipal

                   League website

      Campaign Materials

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

      Constituent Newsletters and other publications

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

      Photograph

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

 

Note: Electronically submitted questionnaires are strongly preferred. All materials can be emailed to rebecca@munileague.org.  They can be processed and made available on-line far more rapidly than handwritten or typed submissions.

 

For non-electronic submissions, please print clearly and legibly and return the application as soon as possible in order to allow the committee the greatest amount of time to prepare a complete report on your skills and experience.

 

If you have not yet been contacted to schedule an interview, or if you have questions about the candidate evaluation program, please contact the League office at 206-264-1070.

 

If you have a disability and require accommodation to participate in the candidate evaluation process, please contact Rebecca Cooper at the League office.

2005 Candidate Questionnaire

 

SECTION I               

 

BASIC CANDIDATE INFORMATION

 

1.      Name as it will appear on the ballot

 

First Name

Middle Initial or Nick Name

Last Name

Richard

     

Conlin

 

2.   Office sought (include office, jurisdiction, position/district number):

 

Seattle City Council, Position 2

 

3.   Are you the incumbent?                  Yes              No

 

 

4.   How long have you resided in this district/city?

 

24 years

 

5.   How long have you resided in King County?

 

24 years

 

6.   Is the office sought partisan or nonpartisan?         Partisan      Nonpartisan         

                                                                                                                       

7.   If partisan, please indicate party:       

 

CAMPAIGN CONTACTS

 

 

Campaign Name:

 

People for Richard Conlin

 

Address:

 

PO Box 22318

 

City/State/Zip:

 

Seattle, WA 98122

 

Campaign Phone:

 

206-947-2399

 

 

Campaign Fax:

 

206-284-5543

 

 

Campaign E-mail:

 

conlin2005@gmail.com

 

 

Campaign Website:

 

www.richardconlin.com

 

 

POLITICAL BACKGROUND

 

1.   Beginning with the most recent position, please list public offices which you have held.  Include positions on appointive Boards or Commissions.

 

Public Office

Elective or Appointive?

Dates Held

Leadership Role (if any)

Seattle City Council

 

Elective

 

1998-present

 

Vice-Chair, King County Board of Health; Vice-Chair, Growth Management Policy Council; Co-Chair, Seashore Transportation Forum

 

City Light Rate Advisory Committee, Alternative Resources Committee

 

Appointive

 

1981-82, 1984-85

 

Co-Chair, Rate Advisory Committee

 

Ingham County Board of Commissioners, Michigan

 

Elected

 

1973-1976

 

Chair of Finance Committee

 

 

2.   If you ran for public office but were not elected, please list those races below:

 

Office Title

Year of Run

None

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

 SECTION III

 

In this section, we are seeking responses that reflect the four ratings criteria: involvement, effectiveness, character, and knowledge.  These are defined as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.      In a page or less, why are you running for this office?  (Note: the interview committee will be given a copy of this statement before your interview; at the beginning of your interview you will have the opportunity to expand on this statement in any way you wish.)

 

I am passionate about democracy.  I want to continue to use my excellent analytical and accomplished leadership skills to meet the needs of the diverse communities of Seattle.

 

In my eight years on the City Council, I’ve made decisions that affect many lives – about public safety, transportation, health care, and education.  I’ve been willing to make tough choices, to take votes based on what I believe in -- and to stand up for the people of Seattle. 

 

My job is to listen to people, resolve conflict, and make decisions based on a set of core values.  My leadership focuses on creating a positive future while keeping what is good about Seattle.  We can have great neighborhoods and a thriving downtown connected by transit, bicycle, pedestrian ways and well-maintained roads.  My goal is to support healthy families, communities, and neighborhoods -- and a vibrant economy whose benefits are shared by all.

 

I am committed to stand for integrity and accountability in our city government.  We reach our goals by making well thought out decisions.  I will continue to ask tough questions on all issues, including the billions of dollars in transportation projects (the monorail, the Alaskan Way Viaduct, the 520 bridge, Sound Transit) that will change the face of our city.  I want to make sure that citizens have a voice and that government is fair, transparent, and responsive.

 

I will continue to be a strong leader and to deliver results.  In the next four years, I want to:

•     Get resources into Seattle’s transportation network, to maintain our roads and bridges, implement our neighborhood plans, promote economic prosperity through freight mobility, and ensure that Seattle is a safe place to walk and bicycle.

•     Keep our communities safe and healthy, by supporting our parks and libraries, working for better public health, housing, education, and human services, and ensuring that our police and firefighters have the support they need.

•     Expand my regional leadership work, to get light rail to the airport and Northgate and across Lake Washington to the Eastside, to keep moving on replacing the Viaduct and the 520 bridge, and to replace our fragmented transportation decision-making with a coordinated regional approach that integrates all transit modes into a seamless whole.

•Restore faith in government by listening and responding to citizens, valuing and supporting our diverse communities, and preserving open, accountable government and a City Council that develops superb public policy to keep Seattle vibrant, functioning, and resilient.

 


 

2.      Describe your most important personal characteristics or traits as they relate to the office you seek.

 

I was inspired to run for City Council because of my deep commitment to our communities.  I served in leadership posts on my community council, and as a founder of Sustainable Seattle, I helped shape Seattle’s Comprehensive Plan.  I base my work on bringing together the core values articulated in that plan – environmental stewardship, economic opportunity, community, and social justice.  We must weave those together to create a positive future while valuing the heritage and commitments that have made Seattle such a wonderful place.      

 

I live by a set of principles that guide me in making good, well thought-out decisions for the people of Seattle.  I am a consistent and experienced city council member who is thoughtful and positive. I work well with a variety of constituencies including labor, environmentalists, developers, neighborhood activists, city staff, communities of color, and regional partners.

 

One of my core strengths is my ability to build win-win solutions by engaging with people, listening to them, identifying their core interests, and negotiating to find ways to resolve conflicts.  When I take on an issue, I identify what’s required, involve people, and avoid the pitfalls that lead to endless process.  I get things done in a timely and systematic manner.  I involve all constituencies, creatively develop solutions, find the right answer (not the hasty one), and follow through by doing the hard work, obtaining support, and ensuring implementation.  I have earned the trust and respect of a wide range of constituencies throughout the City.

 

When issues become contentious I work to find solutions that benefit the City as a whole while meeting the legitimate interests of the various stakeholders, whether they come from business, the neighborhoods, or labor. I believe my style of leadership is critical to preserving the things we love about our City and its neighborhoods.

 

3.      Please describe in sufficient detail, one to three accomplishments or contributions of which you are most proud.  These examples should illustrate effective skills and capabilities you think apply to the office you are seeking.  These accomplishments may have occurred at any time in your personal, professional, or public life. 

 

1.  Northgate Settlement.  The Northgate Area Comprehensive Plan (NACP) was adopted before I joined the Council, but implementation was slow.  Conflict between community members committed to a pedestrian-friendly urban center and interested in daylighting Thornton Creek and the mall owner interested in improving the auto-oriented shopping mall was intense.  Twice the mall owner proposed a plan, and twice other stakeholders immediately sued.  As I worked on the other 37 neighborhood plans, I realized that Northgate must be included in our process.  I began by securing investments -- a new community center in the 1999 levy, a new library in the 1998 bond, a park in the 2000 parks levy, and a community garden.  I also sought ways to improve transportation and resolve the community conflicts.  We were making some progress when Mayor Nickels, in early 2003, proposed a plan that he had negotiated with the mall owner.  The community was outraged, and I was alarmed.  While some of the components of the Nickels plan were positive, it had fundamental flaws, the biggest being the lack of community support that made more years of litigation likely.   I immediately began a process of consultation with the community to explore alternatives.  I also opened dialogue with the development community and with my colleagues on the Council.  By late spring, we had an alternative package that had full community support and the commitment of 5 Councilmembers, but most of the development community was not willing to sign on.  We organized media, developed support from the Northgate Chamber of Commerce, and continued to work with developers to find alternatives.  Under tremendous pressure, I held the coalition of 5 Councilmembers together.  Finally, the Mayor's office offered to negotiate, and we sat down and hammered out a compromise.  The community got its key agenda items -- a coordinated transportation plan, a daylighted Thornton Creek with housing on the South Lot, and an agreement with the mall owner that their second project would be a built-out-to-the-street, pedestrian-friendly development on Fifth Avenue.  The mall owner got an agreement to allow the first development phase that was their primary interest.  With some careful shuttle diplomacy, we got all sides to agree and to join in a Northgate Stakeholders Group to work on future developments.  Since then, all the projects and plans have been moving forward, and the Stakeholders Group has been able to work in harmony as a roundtable for further conflict resolution.  The Northgate example required me to creatively problem-solve, work closely with a variety of constituencies, hang tough when I had to and keep a majority of my colleagues with me, and ultimately forge a win-win solution that everyone now takes ownership of.

 

Neighborhood Plan Approval and Adoption Process.  When I was first elected to the Council, I was asked to lead the committee responsible for 37 neighborhood plans that had been developed as a way to resolve the conflict over Seattle's acceptance of growth targets under the GMA.  The neighborhood planning process was a brilliant success, involving 20,000 people (including myself as one of the initial leaders of the Central Area Plan), with all neighborhoods agreeing to accept their growth targets and coming up with a list of recommendations as to how to make their neighborhoods work with the increased population.  Unfortunately, there had been little planning for how the plans would become approved and implemented.  Working closely with the Executive, I developed the Approval and Adoption process, which involved creating a matrix of plan recommendations and having each Department comment on how they could implement them, with the Council then adopting this as a work plan for the City -- following a public hearing, tours, and other involvement opportunities for plan leaders, as well as conflict resolution around controversial plan recommendations.   With some creative problem solving and patient listening, I was able to steer all plans through the Council with unanimous votes.  In the meantime, we worked together on implementation strategies, ultimately devising a package that included the library bond, community center levy, and parks levy -- all based on the neighborhood plans, and all approved by the voters for a total of almost $500 million in investments.  The package also included an early implementation fund for each plan to jumpstart 3 or 4 specific projects, tripling the neighborhood matching fund, and creating neighborhood development  managers to coordinate future work.  And we developed a formal stewardship structure to ensure continued public involvement.  I continue to be committed to implementing the neighborhood plans, and one of the reasons I chose to Chair the Transportation Committee was because transportation was the major implementation area that we had not been able to fund.

 

Regional Coalition for Transportation Funding.  When I became Chair of the Transportation Committee, the City of Seattle had become largely estranged from its suburban counterparts.  They had organized into three subregional councils, and Seattle refused to even participate in the council that it was assigned to.  The roads versus transit conflict dominated regional decision-making, and neither the legislature nor the King County cities were able to come to agreement on a transportation strategy.  I decided to make it my business to repair this rift.  I started attending the Seashore Regional Forum, and persuaded the Council to ratify the underlying agreement.  I started attending the other forums as well, and had to repeatedly state that I believed that Seattle's interests require us to support improvements in 167, 405, and other highways outside Seattle, because we care about the region -- and because our citizens and businesses use them too.  By 2004 my work had progressed so far that I was elected Co-Chair of the Seashore Forum.  I was able to move a compromise solution on I-90 through the Seattle City Council.  In late 2004 I began meeting with the leaders of the other regional forums to work on the bold idea of coming up with a common legislative agenda for King County.  After much work and negotiation, we agreed on 4 agenda items to take to the legislature, and representatives of 35 cities signed on and joined in the lobbying effort.  Both the 9 cent gas tax increase and the HOT lane experiment on 167 -- two of our agenda items -- were approved by the legislature.  We made progress on our other two priorities -- funding for city and county transportation programs and local options for additional such funding -- and will return in 2006 to try to complete the sweep.


 

4.      Please list or describe your current and past activities in the community in which you have acquired skills that relate to the office you seek.  Include your role in the activity and the year(s) in which you were involved.  Involvement consists of many areas such as family, neighborhood, community, employment, or public life.

 

I have been involved in civic life since my teenage experiences as President of my County Teen Democrats organization and activity in the civil rights movement in Virginia.  I was involved in the first Earth Day in 1970, and in 1971-72 was Co-Chair of Sixth District Citizens for McGovern.  I was elected to the Ingham County Board of Commissioners in 1972, serving for two terms.  In my second term, my colleagues chose me as Chair of the Finance Committee (at the age of 26), where I was responsible for developing and monitoring a $16 million budget.  I left politics to raise my family, and spent two years as a Lecturer in Public Administration at the University of Botswana, an invaluable cross-cultural experience. 

 

I arrived in Seattle in 1981, started a newsletter for the Northwest Energy Coalition (then NCAC), and was selected as a member of the City Light Alternative Resources Advisory Committee, where I wrote the report on renewable resources.  I founded an energy conservation business, and managed two contracts for Seattle City Light and Bonneville Power Administration, supervising seven employees; the business was based at the Phinney Neighborhood Center, and a percentage of the income went to the support PNA programs.  I was a member of the City Light Rates Advisory Committee, a Water Department advisory committee, the Discovery Park Advisory Council, and the Mayor's Environmental Priorities Project Advisory Committee.  I was one of the founders ofer of Sustainable Seattle, the Puget Soundkeeper Alliance, BikeWorks, and the Positive Futures Network, where I served for a year as the first publisher of YES! magazine.  I am a graduate of Leadership Tomorrow (1991).

 

I have been Chair of both Public Safety and Land Use for the Madrona Community Council, and a founding member of the 23rd and Union Neighborhood Planning Team.  My three children are all graduates of Garfield High School, and I was active in the PTSA's and as a soccer referee and baseball coach.

 

Prior to my election to the City Council, I worked for 13 years as Director of the Community and Environment Project of Metrocenter YMCA.  My major projects including founding and directing Seattle YMCA Earth Service Corps, a program to engage teens in environmental education and action; the City Light Study Group, a project that brought business and low income advocates together to monitor city light rates and financial policies; Sustainable Seattle, a volunteer network dedicated to promoting the long-range environmental, economic, cultural, and social vitality of Seattle and King County; and the Master Home Environmentalist, a nationally recognized program to combat childhood asthma and other indoor pollution issues.  I also founded and directed the King County Household Hazardous Waste Round-Ups, and was contracted by King County to manage publicity and education activities for the Household Hazardous Wastemobile.

 

As a Councilmember, I am Co-Chair of the Seashore Transportation Forum, Vice-Chair of the King County Board of Health and the Growth Management Planning Committee, and a member of the WRIA 9 Forum and Steering Committee (planning salmon recovery in the Green-Duwamish Watershed), the Transportation Policy Board, the Regional Transit Committee, and the Executive Committee of the Puget Sound Regional Council, as well as serving as Chair of the Transportation Committee, Vice-Chair of  Finance and Budget, and member of the Urban Development and Planning Committee for the Council.

 

This variety of civic, work, governmental, and political experience has given me both the breadth and depth of knowledge and understanding to make me an effective Councilmember on a wide variety of issues.  All of these activities have reinforced my faith in the collective ability of communities and groups of people to effectively engage in building a better society, and my commitment to civic engagement as a way of life.

 

 

  1. Please describe the duties of the office you seek.  Which are the most important duties and why?

 

  The key duties of the City Council include:

 

1.  Engaging with citizens to educate them about city government and civic life, listen to them about issues and concerns in the community, and partner with them to address community concerns and foster and enhance our democratic society.

2.   In partnership with citizens, creating and sustaining the civic spirit of Seattle and developing a vision for Seattle's future.

3.  Serving as steward of the public resources entrusted to City government, the Comprehensive Plan, our natural environment, and the community institutions that make Seattle's character.

4.  Managing the City's budget and workforce to ensure that resources are used effectively deployed, that the budget is balanced, and that the workforce is treated with dignity and embodies the spirit of public service.

5.  Overseeing key City functions, including police, fire, courts, and emergency preparedness; land use, community development, transportation, and neighborhoods; city utilities, including electricity, water, sewer, drainage, and solid waste; parks, community centers, and libraries; housing, health, and human services

6.  Working with the region to find ways to cooperate around common regional issues, including transportation, the environment, growth management, health and human services, and other regional services.

7.  Ensuring that Seattle government is open and transparent, with decisions made in public, access to decision makers and information, and proactive work to ensure that communities that are less well represented or do not have access through traditional channels can participate.


EDUCATION BACKGROUND SUMMARY

FOR PUBLICATION IN CANDIDATE EVALUATION REPORT

 

The Municipal League’s Candidate Evaluation Report is distributed to voters in print and/or on our website.  It includes a summary of the candidate’s education.  Please summarize your education in 120 characters (letters, punctuation, and space all combined).  The League will delete material that exceeds the space limit by beginning with the last entry.  Suggested order is (degree) (subject) (school) (year, if desired). 

 

Note: If this question is left blank the League will not include education information in your candidate profile.

 

M.A. Political Science, Michigan State University, 1971

B.A. History, Michigan State University, 1968, Phi Beta Kappa

 

CIVIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY

FOR PUBLICATION IN CANDIDATE EVALUATION REPORT

 

The Municipal League’s Candidate Evaluation Report also includes a summary of each candidate’s civic involvement.  Please summarize your civic involvement in the space below.  We will make every attempt to include the information in the Candidate Evaluation Report as submitted.  Due to space restrictions in the Report, your response is limited to 500 characters (letters, punctuation, and spaces all combined).  It is important that you list your involvement beginning with the most important and ending with the least important.  If you exceed the length of response permitted, or if the League should find it necessary to shorten responses for publication purposes, deletions will be made beginning with the last item listed. 

 

Note: This information will appear verbatim on the League’s Candidate Evaluation Report.  If this question is left blank, the Municipal League will not include information on your civic involvement in the Report.

 

  Check here if you would like the Municipal League to copy the first 500 characters from Question 4 to paste into this section.

 

Currently serve as Vice-Chair of the King County Board of Health and the Growth Management Planning Committee and member of the WRIA 9 Forum and Steering Committee, planning salmon recovery in the Green-Duwamish Watershed.

 

Community involvement includes Madrona Community Council, Discovery Park Advisory Council, City Light Rates Advisory Committee and Resource Planning Advisory Committee.  Founding Board member of Sustainable Seattle, the Puget Soundkeeper Alliance, BikeWorks, and the Positive Futures Network.  Graduate of Leadership Tomorrow (1991).

 

Finished!

If at all possible, send your response to the Municipal League electronically as an attachment, or insert it into an e-mail message (rebecca@munileague.org).  Mail and fax numbers are listed below.  If the League has not contacted you to schedule an interview, please call the League office at your earliest convenience.

 

Don’t forget to send the following to the Municipal League:  a resume, a photo, campaign literature, and, if you are an incumbent, constituent newsletters and other materials.  Please use the check-off list on the cover sheet of this packet to indicate which items you have sent.

 

 

THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION AND GOOD LUCK IN YOUR CAMPAIGN!

 

THE MUNICIPAL LEAGUE OF KING COUNTY

 

Candidate Evaluation Coordinator:  Rebecca Cooper

 

810 Third Avenue, Suite 224                  Phone: 206-264-1070                Email: rebecca@munileague.org

Seattle, WA 98104-1614                        Fax: 425-671-0506                        Website: www.munileague.org