The Municipal League of King County

810 Third Avenue, Suite 224

Seattle, WA 98104

 

2005 Board of Trustees

 

Rita Brogan, Chair

Mark Troxel, Vice Chair

Beth M. Arman, Secretary

Harold Taniguchi, Treasurer

 

Putnam Barber, Executive Alliance

Vaughnetta J. Barton, community volunteer

Jill D. Bowman, Stoel Rives

Patricia Bowman, human resources manager (ret.)

Bruce Carter, judge pro tem, Seattle Municipal Court

Kevin Carter, Safeco

Stephanie Cirkovich, Pike Place Market PDA

Peter Coates, Building and Construction Trades Council

Chris Cooper, CHHIP

Paul Demitriades, Medina City Council (ret.)

Sandra Driscoll, City Attorney (ret)

Deborah Eddy, Consultant

Keven Franklin, King County

Mary Gates, Consultant

Norma Jean Hanson, Norma Jean Hanson Paralegal Services

Robert Klein, McNaul, Ebel, Nawrot, and Helgren

Eric Laschever, Stoel Rives

Steve Marshall, Snohomish PUD

Rob Neate, Puget Sound Energy

Jennifer Piccolo, citizen activist

Charles Redell, Reporter

Tami Ritoch, Fireside Homes Real Estate Associate

R. Todd Slind, CH2MHill

Lucy Steers, public participation consultant

Harold Taniguchi, King County Department of Transportation

Rashelle Tanner, CRISTA Ministries

David Tarshes, Davis Wright Tremaine

Kate Tate, Weyerhauser

Philip Thompson, Perkins Coie

Mark Troxel, City of Seattle

Wes Uhlman, Wes Uhlman & Associates

Rich White, Boeing

2005 CANDIDATE BACKGROUND QUESTIONNAIRE
FOR NON-JUDICIAL CANDIDATES

 

The Municipal League of King County requests every candidate who participates in the candidate evaluation process to submit background information prior to his/her interview with a candidate evaluation committee.  The questionnaire is the basis of the League’s research and interview process.  The League’s ratings are non-partisan; they are based on standards of Involvement, Effectiveness, Character, and Knowledge, all of which have been developed and refined over the past 90 years.

 

A printed version of the questionnaire is available for candidates who prefer to use the traditional format.  To obtain a hard copy, please contact the League office.  A copy of this questionnaire will be provided to Candidate Evaluation Committee members to help them prepare for your interview.  Candidate responses, except the confidential section, will be available to the general public at the League website. 

 

The Municipal League requests the following materials from candidates.  Please check to make certain you have sent in your:

 

      Candidate Questionnaire

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

      Resume (education, employment, and professional activities)

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

               Check here if you DO NOT want your resume posted on the Municipal

                   League website

      Campaign Materials

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

      Constituent Newsletters and other publications

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

      Photograph

          Sent by:         Email             US Mail          Fax            Not Sending

 

Note: Electronically submitted questionnaires are strongly preferred. All materials can be emailed to rebecca@munileague.org.  They can be processed and made available on-line far more rapidly than handwritten or typed submissions.

 

For non-electronic submissions, please print clearly and legibly and return the application as soon as possible in order to allow the committee the greatest amount of time to prepare a complete report on your skills and experience.

 

If you have not yet been contacted to schedule an interview, or if you have questions about the candidate evaluation program, please contact the League office at 206-264-1070.

 

If you have a disability and require accommodation to participate in the candidate evaluation process, please contact Rebecca Cooper at the League office.

2005 Candidate Questionnaire

 

SECTION I               

 

BASIC CANDIDATE INFORMATION

 

1.      Name as it will appear on the ballot

 

First Name

Middle Initial or Nick Name

Last Name

Ron

     

Sims

 

2.   Office sought (include office, jurisdiction, position/district number):

 

King County Executive

 

3.   Are you the incumbent?                  Yes              No

 

 

4.   How long have you resided in this district/city?

 

30 + years

 

5.   How long have you resided in King County?

 

30 + years

 

6.   Is the office sought partisan or nonpartisan?         Partisan      Nonpartisan         

                                                                                                                       

7.   If partisan, please indicate party:  Democrat

 

CAMPAIGN CONTACTS

 

 

Campaign Name:

 

Ron Sims for King County Executive

 

Address:

 

P.O. Box 4429

 

City/State/Zip:

 

Seattle, WA 98194

 

Campaign Phone:

 

(206) 903-8197

 

 

Campaign Fax:

 

(206) 903-0439

 

 

Campaign E-mail:

 

ron@ronsims.com

 

 

Campaign Website:

 

www.ronsims.com

 

 

POLITICAL BACKGROUND

 

1.   Beginning with the most recent position, please list public offices which you have held.  Include positions on appointive Boards or Commissions.

 

Public Office

Elective or Appointive?

Dates Held

Leadership Role (if any)

King County Executive

 

Elected

 

1997 - present

 

     

 

King County Council

 

Elected

 

1985 - 1997

 

Chair, Budget Chair

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

 

2.   If you ran for public office but were not elected, please list those races below:

 

Office Title

Year of Run

Washington State Governor

 

2004

 

United States Senate

 

1994

 

     

 

     

 


 SECTION III

 

In this section, we are seeking responses that reflect the four ratings criteria: involvement, effectiveness, character, and knowledge.  These are defined as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.      In a page or less, why are you running for this office?  (Note: the interview committee will be given a copy of this statement before your interview; at the beginning of your interview you will have the opportunity to expand on this statement in any way you wish.)

 

I am running for King County Executive because there remains much to do to improve our great county.  King County is a wonderful place to live, a diverse place that encompasses pristine natural spaces of breathtaking beauty and the urban vitality of Seattle, which I believe is one of the most attractive and culturally important cities in America. But with 1.8 million residents -- we are the 13th largest county in the nation -- we face enormous and complex challenges in preserving and, in some respects, improving on our unique way of life here in the Pacific Northwest.

 

First and foremost, I believe in good governance, which must include both the boldness to grasp opportunity when it arises and the experience and determination to push forward thoughtful solutions to pressing problems no matter how intractable or politically difficult they may seem. We must have leadership that can articulate a broad and compelling vision for the future. I believe I have done that and will continue to do that. My main themes I intend to pursue over the next four years are:  begin the restoration of Puget Sound; implementing a comprehensive reform of our regional health care system designed to harness the power of market forces in a way that will simultaneously improve the quality of our health care system while reducing skyrocketing premium growth; and what I call our quality of life issues. Those include increasing trail capacity in the county, ensuring affordable housing and working to end homelessness and other social ills that afflict many of the weakest and most vulnerable among us, increasing our transportation alternatives, ensuring clean air and clean water and preserving another 100,000 acres of open space and forest land for future generations. I have led major initiatives in all of these crucial areas that I would be happy to discuss with you in more detail in person.

 

The rich variety of experience and knowledge I have gained through my years of public service has gifted me with a deep understanding of the values of the people of King County. Those basic values are manifested in a concern for the natural world growth management, preservation of forest lands and open space, the importance of cleaning up our environment and restoring our important bodies of water, providing real transportation solutions and choices, as well as providing the important social safety net for the most vulnerable in our society.  We are at a crossroads now, with some calling for rolling back the gains we have made over the past few years.  I am confident that ís not the future the people of King County want.

 


 

2.      Describe your most important personal characteristics or traits as they relate to the office you seek.

 

 I am not afraid to lead. Some people in political life are only concerned with doing the popular thing. I say without hesitation that I care about doing the right thing. At times that has meant taking firm stands on issues that have sparked controversy. Let me give you an example. Last year the issue of marriage equality came to the fore just as I was launching my run for governor. Some advised me to duck the issue, but I felt it was important to state my views forthrightly and I did. As far as I am concerned, marriage equality is an important civil rights issue; there is nothing more personally important to me than the belief that as a society we must strive to treat all people equally. I did not shy away from saying that publicly, though I’m sure it may have hurt my campaign to do so. On the other hand, there were many in the spring of 2004 loudly demanding that I issue marriage licenses to couples on my own authority. I refused. I believe in the rule of law and I knew that if the marriage issue was to be resolved, it would have to be addressed in an orderly way and that any social change of this magnitude could not happen without the full sanction of law. So I worked to steer the issue into the courts, where it could be addressed dispassionately. After two positive lower court rulings, we are expecting a supreme court ruling soon. Nothing makes me happier than the fact that some of those who criticized me most vociferously last year have acknowledged in recent months that I handled the issue the right way.

     

As an individual, I am not afraid of change, and I am constantly striving to improve myself: to learn more, to increase my compassion for those less fortunate, to seek out new challenges. I believe that as a society we must do the same. It is in the ongoing quest to better ourselves as a community that we discover the most effective paths to progress. To stand still as a society is to invite stagnation.

 

And I am naturally optimistic about the future. 

 

3.      Please describe in sufficient detail, one to three accomplishments or contributions of which you are most proud.  These examples should illustrate effective skills and capabilities you think apply to the office you are seeking.  These accomplishments may have occurred at any time in your personal, professional, or public life. 

 

First, an example from my younger days: soon after I arrived as a freshman at Central Washington University, I was told by a person in a position of authority that I did not deserve to be there and would never graduate. I took that as a challenge and I was determined to excel. I was elected student body president along the way, and just before I graduated I saw that person and he told me that he had been wrong about me. I am proud about that to this day.

 

More recently, I am extremely proud of the effort we have launched to tackle the issue of rising health care costs. There is nothing like it anywhere in the country. Last year, after taking expert advice from a group of health care professionals, actuaries and health policy experts, I brought together representatives of all the major players in the health care delivery system – employers, workers’ representatives, insurers, and providers – and convinced them to work together collaboratively to form a non-profit to provide leadership, market clout and strategies for care purchasing and delivery in the four-county region including King, Pierce, Snohomish and Kitsap counties.  Thus the Puget Sound Health Alliance was born, with a mission to fundamentally change the delivery of health care in our region.

 

The response has been overwhelming. This Alliance currently includes more than 50 organizations, including Boeing, Starbucks, GroupHealth, Regence and others, and covers over 750,000 lives in the Puget Sound Region. Together we are working toward the fundamental improvement of the quality of care in the region while reducing the increases in health care costs.  Such reductions not only help employers, workers and investors, but will also save taxpayers significant money in the future. 

 

The Alliance, of which I serve as Chair, is the perfect example of how government can play a role in significantly altering our health care delivery system.  For too long government has played a back-seat role in changing health care.  Here in King County, and throughout the four-county region covered by the Alliance, government has become a leader in such change.

 

Finally, I am particulary proud of the accomplishments we made in securing the financial health of King County.  When the recession and budget cuts hit, I took action by streamlining government operations and making service delivery more efficient. I reduced the county budget by more than $130 million without reducing essential services. My administration brought fiscal discipline to county government and as a result King County today enjoys one of the highest credit ratings in the country – higher than most other counties in the nation and higher than the State of Washington.

 

During these difficult years I also worked to protect the most vulnerable in our community.  I established a county policy to protect the paychecks, benefits and seniority of county employees who were called to serve in Iraq and Afghanistan. When state funding for vital community and human services fell victim to budget cuts I lead the effort to secure money to help battered mothers, the homeless, abused children and low-income seniors.


 

4.      Please list or describe your current and past activities in the community in which you have acquired skills that relate to the office you seek.  Include your role in the activity and the year(s) in which you were involved.  Involvement consists of many areas such as family, neighborhood, community, employment, or public life.

 

I have dedicated my life to public service and have been involved in my community from a very young age where I joined my parents in pushing for social change in Spokane.  After graduating from college, I worked in the Consumer Protection Division of the Washington State Attorney General’s office, and later went on to the Federal Trade Commission where I fought against consumer fraud and abuse.  Recruited to run the City of Seattle’s juvenile offender program, I remained head of the program until becoming a legislative aide in the Washington State Senate.

 

In 1985 I was elected to the King County Council, representing the 5th district and was overwhelmingly reelected twice.  On the Council I proved myself as an active budget hawk, serving as Chair for two years and later as Chair of the Council.  As a Councilmember I initiated a number of important legislative actions that resulted in increased environmental protection, public safety, and the protection of worker rights.  In 1987, along with then Councilmember Bruce Laing, I lead the effort to rename King County in honor of Dr. Martin Luther King.

 

I was appointed County Executive in 1996 and then reelected twice with the largest margin of victory ever for this office.  Under my administration we have protected over 130,000 acres of forest land and open space, guided the County through a signifciant budget crisis while maintainig our high credit rating and preserving core services.  We have increased bus service, added additional miles of trails to our system and protected the paychecks and benefits  of employees serving in the National Guard.

 

Throughout my political career I have also made it a point to remain an active community volunteer.  As a lay minister, I volunteerd for Operation Nightwatch, which serves homeless individuals in the City of Seattle.  A longtime football and baseball coach for the Rainier Valley sports leagues, I have also been a regular tutor at Meany Middle school for many years.  I also founded both Pista sa Nayon, Seattle's Filipino American Community Festival, and the Paul Robeson Scholar Athlete Awards, which honors young athletes who excel in academics.

 

 

  1. Please describe the duties of the office you seek.  Which are the most important duties and why?

 

Heading King County government is a difficult job. With 13,000 employees spread over multiple departments tasked with countless responsibilities, King County is one of the largest government entities in the state. Just organizing this bureaucracy and making sure it functions in the interests of the citizens of the County is a full-time job. I am proud of the fact that as we have gone through difficult economic times in recent years we have found ways to cut the size of government without cutting into basic services. I have always been a fiscal conservative, and I am proud of the fact that even after years of fiscal challenges, we have balanced our budgets and earned top bond ratings in King County.

 

But running the government is only part of the job. Some problems cannot be solved by government alone. That means that often the job requires leadership skills such as bringing people, often with competing interests, together to the table to forge consensual solutions to pressing problems. I believe strongly in such public-private partnerships. When we took up the issue of salmon recovery in 1999, that is the approach that I championed. It works. I co-founded Shared Strategy, which has, over five years of difficult work, hammered out a blueprint for how we will preserve habitat in the region without slowing economic progress. And this is the same approach we are now employing to find regional solutions to our health care cost crisis.

 


EDUCATION BACKGROUND SUMMARY

FOR PUBLICATION IN CANDIDATE EVALUATION REPORT

 

The Municipal League’s Candidate Evaluation Report is distributed to voters in print and/or on our website.  It includes a summary of the candidate’s education.  Please summarize your education in 120 characters (letters, punctuation, and space all combined).  The League will delete material that exceeds the space limit by beginning with the last entry.  Suggested order is (degree) (subject) (school) (year, if desired). 

 

Note: If this question is left blank the League will not include education information in your candidate profile.

 

A graduate of Lewis and Clark High School in Spokane, I then went on to Central Washington University where I graduated with a Bachelor of Arts in Psychology.

 

CIVIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY

FOR PUBLICATION IN CANDIDATE EVALUATION REPORT

 

The Municipal League’s Candidate Evaluation Report also includes a summary of each candidate’s civic involvement.  Please summarize your civic involvement in the space below.  We will make every attempt to include the information in the Candidate Evaluation Report as submitted.  Due to space restrictions in the Report, your response is limited to 500 characters (letters, punctuation, and spaces all combined).  It is important that you list your involvement beginning with the most important and ending with the least important.  If you exceed the length of response permitted, or if the League should find it necessary to shorten responses for publication purposes, deletions will be made beginning with the last item listed. 

 

Note: This information will appear verbatim on the League’s Candidate Evaluation Report.  If this question is left blank, the Municipal League will not include information on your civic involvement in the Report.

 

  Check here if you would like the Municipal League to copy the first 500 characters from Question 4 to paste into this section.

 

     

 

Finished!

If at all possible, send your response to the Municipal League electronically as an attachment, or insert it into an e-mail message (rebecca@munileague.org).  Mail and fax numbers are listed below.  If the League has not contacted you to schedule an interview, please call the League office at your earliest convenience.

 

Don’t forget to send the following to the Municipal League:  a resume, a photo, campaign literature, and, if you are an incumbent, constituent newsletters and other materials.  Please use the check-off list on the cover sheet of this packet to indicate which items you have sent.

 

 

THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION AND GOOD LUCK IN YOUR CAMPAIGN!

 

THE MUNICIPAL LEAGUE OF KING COUNTY

 

Candidate Evaluation Coordinator:  Rebecca Cooper

 

810 Third Avenue, Suite 224                  Phone: 206-264-1070                Email: rebecca@munileague.org

Seattle, WA 98104-1614                        Fax: 425-671-0506                        Website: www.munileague.org