SECTION I               

 

BASIC CANDIDATE INFORMATION

 

1.      Name as it will appear on the ballot

 

First Name

Middle Initial or Nick Name

Last Name

Christopher

A

Washington

 

2.   Office sought (include office, jurisdiction, position/district number):

 

Position 42 King County Superior Court

 

3.   Are you the incumbent?                 Yes              No

 

 

4.   How long have you resided in this district/city?

 

26 years

 

5.   How long have you resided in King County?

 

26 years

 

6.   Is the office sought partisan or nonpartisan?          Partisan       Nonpartisan         

                                                                                                                       

7.   If partisan, please indicate party:  n/a

 

CAMPAIGN CONTACTS

 

 

Campaign Name:

 

Chris Washington for Judge

 

Address:

 

10827 Valmay N.W.

 

City/State/Zip:

 

Seattle, WA 98177

 

Campaign Phone:

 

206.683.5723

 

 

Campaign Fax:

 

206.382.1338

 

 

Campaign E-mail:

 

cwashington@omwlaw.com

 

 

Campaign Website:

 

www.washingtonforjudge.org.

 

 

POLITICAL BACKGROUND

 

1.   Beginning with the most recent position, please list public offices which you have held.  Include positions on appointive Boards or Commissions.

 

Public Office

Elective or Appointive?

Dates Held

Leadership Role (if any)

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

 

2.   If you ran for public office but were not elected, please list those races below:

 

Office Title

Year of Run

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 

     

 



SECTION III

 

In this section, we are seeking responses that reflect the four ratings criteria: involvement, effectiveness, character, and knowledge.  These are defined as follows:

 

  • Involvement: What has the candidate done previously in family, neighborhood, community, volunteer work, employment or public life to suggest readiness to accomplish challenging objectives? How do these activities demonstrate readiness for the challenges unique to the office sought?

 

  • Effectiveness: Has the candidate demonstrated promise of being productive in the office sought?  Has the candidate shown the ability to work with other people?

 

  • Character: Do the candidate's personal traits show the ability to take on the responsibilities of campaigning for and holding the public office she or he is seeking? Is the candidate a leader, participant or observer?  Is the candidate trustworthy, reliable and candid?

 

§         Knowledge: Has the candidate demonstrated the willingness and ability to learn and adapt?  Does the candidate understand the duties and challenges of the office sought?  Does the candidate have a firm grasp of the issues important to his or her constituency and their potential effects?

 

 

1.      In a page or less, why are you running for this office?  (Note: the interview committee will be given a copy of this statement before your interview; at the beginning of your interview you will have the opportunity to expand on this statement in any way you wish.)

 

 

After almost 30 years of practicing law as an attorney I have made the decision to  run for Position 42 on the King County Superior Court. Judge Scott, who currently holds this seat, is leaving the bench and has been kind enough to urge me to run for this position.

 

I believe I offer a combination of legal and practical experience that will be valuable as a judge.  During my 28 years as a trial attorney I have tried over 200 criminal and civil cases.  I have represented clients in in criminal cases in both the adult and juvenile courts.  I have appeared before close to 100 different Superior Court judges throughout the state representing both plaintiffs and defendants.  My family life with three children has also taught me to listen to both sides of an argument before making a decision.

 

My trial experience includes:

 prosecution  Prosecutor’s·of felony cases with the King County Office;

 representing ·the interests of  plaintiffs and defendants in civil matters;

 representing municipalities and law enforcement agencies ·;

 currently  litigation practice area (Ogden·serving as the chair of my law firm’s Murphy Wallace);.

 service ·as an arbitrator in assigned mandatory arbitration cases;

·  sitting as a judge pro tem in the King County District Court.

 

I have considered running for a judicial position for some time.  While I feel I have been effective as an advocate I believe I would be well suited to work to resolve and decide legal disputes.  I have worked well with both opposing and co-counsel both to resolve issues and to try caes if necessary.  I have always tried to be considerate of  the feelings of all parties in my cases and treated them with respect. 

 

I have kept in touch with lawyers I have worked with who are currently on the bench and have asked them about the work they do and the pressures they experience.  I have also asked about their view of the court's caseload and what could be done to increase the court's efficiency.  I would like the opportunity to work with the court to address these issues.

 


 

2.      Describe your most important personal characteristics or traits as they relate to the office you seek.

 

I try to be fair.  One of the most important traits of a judge is to keep an open mind and be fair to all parties.  My work as an attorney has included representing clients in both criminal and civil matters.  I have represented the State in criminal prosecutions and defendants who have been charged with crimes.  I have represented people injured in accidents and the people sued for their involvement in those accidents.  As a result I have developed an appreciation of how much the vantage point of a litigant affects their expectations of the court.  I think that this experience will be helpful in maintaining an open mind in making rulings and decisions on the bench. 

 

I work well with people.  I enjoy working with people to accomplish the tasks that need to be completed.  I recognize the wide variety of responsibilities of a Superior Court judge and the importance of each judge being willing to work where needed, whether it is juvenile court, the mental health calendar , the civil calendar or the criminal calendar.  I look forward to working with the other judges to make the court as efficient as possible.

 

I treat people with respect.  Throughout my career I have met both clients and opposing parties from all walks of life.  I have always recognized the complexity of each person's life and how this relates to the decisions they have made.  While the law must be applied properly I think it is important to explain to each person the reasons for the court's decision.  Obviously this may not satisfy everyone but the attempt should still be made. 

 

 

 

3.      Please describe in sufficient detail, one to three accomplishments or contributions of which you are most proud.  These examples should illustrate effective skills and capabilities you think apply to the office you are seeking.  These accomplishments may have occurred at any time in your personal, professional, or public life. 

 

While this first answer may be more broad than this question intends I think the my three children are my most significant accomplishment.  While I certainly share this with my wife, even claiming one half the credit for their success in school and their relationships with friends and  superiors is significant.  Their behavior reflects the values that they have been taught.  They have good senses or humor, they are open minded in their approach to problems and they are able to accept responsibility.  This is, at least in part, due to the way that they have been raised.  

 

In 1998 I was asked by Bishop George Thomas to serve on an advisory board with the Archdiocese of Seattle to assist it in developing procedures for the church to respond to allegations of sexual abuse by clergy.  From that date to the present time I have worked with other board members and various diocesan supervisors and canonical counsel to develop a program  that responds to these allegations in a fair and compassionate manner.  In large part due to the Archbishop's determination, since the board's creation  Seattle has avoided the problems and publicity experienced by other dioceses which have not been as responsive to these issues.

 

 


 

4.      Please list or describe your current and past activities in the community in which you have acquired skills that relate to the office you seek.  Include your role in the activity and the year(s) in which you were involved.  Involvement consists of many areas such as family, neighborhood, community, employment, or public life.

 

For the past 12 years I have worked with my law firm's human resource director to interview  summer intern and associate applicants and make hiring recommendations to the firm.  This has included explaining the firms culture and work ethic in a fair but hopefully intriguing way.  At the same time i tried to learn the applicant's interests in both law and life to gauge whether they would enjoy working with the firm. I also was responsible for informing the applicants of the firms hiring decision. 

 

I was a board member of the View Ridge  Swim Club for six years, 2 of which a served as president.  The board oversaw  the clubs' finances, operation and membership.  For each issue there was ususally a full spectrum of opinions which the board needed to consider before making a decision.

 

Since 1996 I  have served on an advisory board for the Sexual Offender Treatment Program at the Monroe Reformatory.  I provided the legal component to a board consisting of representatives from the Department of Corrections, law enforcement, academia and psychological service providers.  The board was informed of issues concerning the program's mandated treatment of sexual offenders within the prison system and gave its advice accordingly.  I became aware not only of the specifics of the counseling but also the interplay between legislative mandates, public safety and budget constraints.

 

 

  1. Please describe the duties of the office you seek.  Which are the most important duties and why?

 

A Superior Court judge presides over hearings and trials in criminal cases for both adults and juveniles, in civil cases and mental health hearings.  It is necessary for the judge to be informed as to the applicable law and rules of evidence.  The judge should be impartial but mindful of the capabilities of the parties and their attorneys.  Finally the judge should be decisive and clear in the decision or ruling that is made on an issue or case.  The parties must know how the issues have been resolved in order to decide how to proceed.

 

Each judge also has a duty to be involved in the general operation of the court system.  This would include a willingness to be assigned to the various calendars and to assist other judges in when emergencies or special situations arise.  This includes a willingness to serve as a settlement judge for cases that could result in matters being resolved without the time and expense of a trial.


EDUCATION BACKGROUND SUMMARY

FOR PUBLICATION IN CANDIDATE EVALUATION REPORT

 

The Municipal League’s Candidate Evaluation Report is distributed to voters in print and/or on our website.  It includes a summary of the candidate’s education.  Please summarize your education in 120 characters (letters, punctuation, and space all combined).  The League will delete material that exceeds the space limit by beginning with the last entry.  Suggested order is (degree) (subject) (school) (year, if desired). 

 

Note: If this question is left blank the League will not include education information in your candidate profile.

 

University of Wisconsin                      J.D.              1976

Marquette University                            B.A.             1973

 

CIVIC INVOLVEMENT SUMMARY

FOR PUBLICATION IN CANDIDATE EVALUATION REPORT

 

The Municipal League’s Candidate Evaluation Report also includes a summary of each candidate’s civic involvement.  Please summarize your civic involvement in the space below.  We will make every attempt to include the information in the Candidate Evaluation Report as submitted.  Due to space restrictions in the Report, your response is limited to 500 characters (letters, punctuation, and spaces all combined).  It is important that you list your involvement beginning with the most important and ending with the least important.  If you exceed the length of response permitted, or if the League should find it necessary to shorten responses for publication purposes,  deletions will be made beginning with the last item listed. 

 

Note: This information will appear verbatim on the League’s Candidate Evaluation Report.  If this question is left blank, the Municipal League will not include information on your civic involvement in the Report.

 

  Check here if you would like the Municipal League to copy the first 500 characters from Question 4 to paste into this section.

 

 Advisory board with the Archdiocese of Seattle to develop procedures for the church to respond to allegations of sexual abuse by clergy

 

Board member  with Committee for Children

 

Volunteer with Food Lifeline

 

Recruiting chair of Ogden Murphy Wallace

 

Reader for Washington State  Braillle and Talking Book Library

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Judicial Candidate Questionnaire

 

1.   Briefly describe the nature of your current practice/position including types of clients and areas, if any, of specialization.  State what percentage involves civil litigation, criminal litigation, and/or nonlitigation.

 

      Currently my legal practice is related to litigation.  While this includes actual trial work in both state and federal courts it most often involves other services.  Client must be counseled concerning the advisability of filing a lawsuit and the costs and benefits of litigation.  Prior to trial information must be obtained through depositions and other discovery.  Since the majority of cases settle as the result of negotiations or mediation I work to educate my clients and counsel them throughout these settlement dispute resolution processes.    As the the percentage of each type of litigation, almost all of my work is civil litigaton though my work for plaintiff and defendant is equally divided.

 

 

 

2.   Identify all your experience as a neutral decision maker (e.g. judge, permanent or pro tem, in any jurisdiction, administrative law judge, hearing officer, arbitrator, etc.)

 

  In the past I volunteered to sit a a pro tem judge in Seattle District Court.  I heard small claims cases.  I have also been participated in the Mandatory Arbitration program in which the Superor Court assigns cases with monetary claims of less that $35,000 to attorneys who have volunteered to serve as arbitrators.  I have been assigned approximately 40 arbitration cases by the court.  Once assigned I have made decisions regarding discovery and scheduling prior to the actual arbitration.  I would estimte that ten of these cases were arbitrated.  

 

3.   If you have been a judge, identify any court committees on which you have served or administrative positions you have held, including dates.

 

     

 


 

4.   List the approximate percentage of your time over the last five years you have made appearances in:

 

     

% municipal court

 

     

% state district court

 

 95   

% superior court

 

  5  

% federal district court

 

     

% appellate court

 

     

% administrative tribunals

 

5.   Are you now an officer or director of any business enterprise other than your law practice?  If so, what role do you expect to play if elected?

 

   No 

 

6.   Have you ever been disciplined or determined to be in breach of professional conduct by any court, administrative agency, bar association, disciplinary committee, judicial conduct commission, or other professional group?  Have you ever had a formal complaint filed against you with the WSBA?  If so for either or both questions, give the particulars, including the outcome.

 

  No


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finished!

If at all possible, send your response to the Municipal League electronically as an attachment, or insert it into an e-mail message (rebecca@munileague.org).  Mail and fax numbers are listed below.  If the League has not contacted you to schedule an interview, please call the League office at your earliest convenience.

 

Don’t forget to send the following to the Municipal League:  a resume, a photo, campaign literature, and, if you are an incumbent, constituent newsletters and other materials.  Please use the check-off list on the cover sheet of this packet to indicate which items you have sent.

 

THANK YOU FOR YOUR COOPERATION AND GOOD LUCK IN YOUR CAMPAIGN!

 

THE MUNICIPAL LEAGUE OF KING COUNTY

 

Candidate Evaluation Coordinator:  Rebecca Cooper

 

810 Third Avenue, Suite 224                  Phone: 206-622-8333                Email: rebecca@munileague.org

Seattle, WA 98104-1614                        Fax: 425-671-0506                       Website: www.munileague.org